3rd Wide

JKool · 03-07-2005, 04:44 PM

Ok, I know we all expect great things from Gardner, Henderson, and Stallworth, but I was wondering what you guys think about these options:

(1) Burress? Probably too expensive to be a number two or three, but are there other reasons not too look?

(2) David Patten:

David Patten is a legitimate threat in the vertical passing game due to his speed, quickness, and ability retains his momentum with the ball in the air. Though undersized, Patten utilizes his body well to keep a defender from the ball. His ability to find the zone and seams in coverage has enhanced his production and ability to make the big play with regularity. Patten does not posses the ability to fight for the high-ball and can be out-muscled in press coverage. He should remain a viable option as a spot receiver for a team seeking depth and a downfield threat.

(3) Tai Streets:

Signed by Detroit as an unrestricted free-agent in 2004. Former Wolverine returns to the state after spending the previous five seasons with San Francisco. Had best season in 2002 after tallying 72 receptions for 756 yards and five TD's. Tall, physical receiver with good fluid movement and soft hands.

(4) Kevin Johnson?

Link: http://scout.scout.com

Perhaps WR is just not worth addressing? What do you guys think?

What about the chances of re-signing Pathon to a cheaper contract?

03-07-2005, 04:44 PM	#1
JKool 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 2,423	3rd Wide Ok, I know we all expect great things from Gardner, Henderson, and Stallworth, but I was wondering what you guys think about these options: (1) Burress? Probably too expensive to be a number two or three, but are there other reasons not too look? (2) David Patten: David Patten is a legitimate threat in the vertical passing game due to his speed, quickness, and ability retains his momentum with the ball in the air. Though undersized, Patten utilizes his body well to keep a defender from the ball. His ability to find the zone and seams in coverage has enhanced his production and ability to make the big play with regularity. Patten does not posses the ability to fight for the high-ball and can be out-muscled in press coverage. He should remain a viable option as a spot receiver for a team seeking depth and a downfield threat. (3) Tai Streets: Signed by Detroit as an unrestricted free-agent in 2004. Former Wolverine returns to the state after spending the previous five seasons with San Francisco. Had best season in 2002 after tallying 72 receptions for 756 yards and five TD's. Tall, physical receiver with good fluid movement and soft hands. (4) Kevin Johnson? Link: http://scout.scout.com Perhaps WR is just not worth addressing? What do you guys think? What about the chances of re-signing Pathon to a cheaper contract?