![]() |
Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
Lots of questionable PI calls yesterday.
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
I like Bill Belick's suggestion of coaches get two challenges, but they can challenge anything.
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
Quote:
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
In before 5 hour football games
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
Quote:
Sometimes it doesn't seem to matter to the officials though. Like this week, sometimes they seem determined to dominate a game. |
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
The damn games are too long as it is. We have to do something about the length of the challenges...........or something. Damn.
Still, something has to be done about the referees poor play calling. It's quite the conundrum. |
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
roger does not care. it will cut into the commercial time.
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
Quote:
Everything should be on the review menu. And I don't like the limit of two, but if that's how it is, it's stupid to dictate to coaches what they can and cannot challenge. Something that carries as huge of an impact as pass interference does should absolutely be under the automatic review list. College automatically reviews their "targeting" calls. At least that shows that they are willing to review a penalty. The NFL acts like penalties are sacred and cannot be questioned. |
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
I love watching NFL football. Five hour games would simply give me more to watch.
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
Make it a 15 yrd penalty auto first down problem solved. Always hated that it was a spot foul should have changed 30yrs ago
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
like anything, if the refs just call PI when there is PI it will cut down down on PI
This league used to have headslaps and crack back blocks and 10 different ways to get away with holding. There are rules in place. Enforce them |
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
I also think they should make it 15 yards and 1st down like college. Spot foul is just too big of a bailout.
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
They're all subjective anyway, either at game-speed or in slow-motion. It'd have a net effect of zero.
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
Quote:
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
Quote:
Teams will abuse it. If you beat take the 15 yards late in the game that could be huge |
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
Quote:
|
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
I can see both sides of this.
1. The penalty for PI is justfigied if they didn't cause that penalty the player could have caught it and so the penalty should be a spot foul. 2. I am ok with a PI penalty - spot foul - be challenged. I would feel this way if 2 during this game wasn't obviously should have been no calls. The player was playing the ball and his head was turned to eye the ball. One not so much. |
Re: Sean Payton lobbies for replay review of pass interference
A judgment call in real-time followed by a judgment call in slow motion...
from four different angles...and three minutes of discussion... resulting in the call being upheld on the field... or overturned after 2nd guessing the official which causes him to overlook the next mugging... stirring up a whole other post-game discussion and Mike&Mike morning topic... No thanks! It's bad enough. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com