![]() |
The 2017 Byrd quandary
What would you do with him next year? Pay cut? So far he has registered 67 total tackles and one pass defended.
http://wvue.images.worldnow.com/images/8740657_G.jpg Thoughts? |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Lately he hasn't been as bad as he was at first, however the money we are paying him you can't just settle for "not bad." For that kind of money he needs to be a difference maker, I never see him undercut routes for picks or force fumbles, simply not worth it. I think release.
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Haircut on the money for sure, if he doesn't I want to go after the S from Michigan.
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
I am not very knowledgeable with salary cap issues, but I would guess if the cap hit isn't too bad he will wind up being released. Yes, he has been better this year, but he has not made the impact that warrants what the Saints are paying for.
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
2017 is the first year Byrd would actual be a positive cut
cap hit - dead money = savings $11,700,000 - $8,000,000 = $3.7 mill I would approach the off season trying not to back myself in a corner at FS but if I need some extra money to sign a quality FA and put a second year man back there starting, here is an option. I am still not sold on Bell at FS Now the target year iMO would be 2018 $12,200,000 - $4,600,000 = $8 mill Now the writing is on the wall IMO. because in 2019 $10,200,000 - $1,200,000 = $9 mill There is a good chance he survives IMO in 2017. FA market will determine the to cut or not to cut move. Watch the draft closely. Couple of pretty good safeties should be available to us in the draft. This a S, CB/S, CB rich draft. I would not be surprised to see us get at least 2 new faces in the secondary. a little wheeling and dealing possibly 3. Which would not bother me at all But if money is needed Byrd is on the Cap causality options list without a doubt. |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
It is hard coming back from multiple knee recos and he is only just starting to come good. Agree he needs to take a haircut in salary but I feel his experience has helped guys like Vaccaro and Bell (who I think is going to be a very good player for us).
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Well we just spent two draft picks (3rd and 4th round pick) to acquire the back of the 2nd round pick on Vonn Bell...
So going out and spending Byrd cash and limiting Bell's playing time makes absolutely no sense, especially with his promise... If you're gonna slot that kinda money for a safety, cut Byrd and go get somebody like Eric Berry, but I still wouldn't do it... Raphael Bush is still out there but he may prefer to start in Detroit or destinations unknown than take even a little more to return... Daniel Huff or Marques Huff are RFAs; maybe a Kelcie McCray or Bacarri Rambo, but you're asking veterans to backup a second year guy... I see three (3) options... First, stand pat, continue to take it in the salary cap with the Byrd contract and keep the slot there until next year for the SS Vaccaro... Second, seek out a backup free safety with a mid round pick or convince a Rambo or McCray we're that close to a championship... Third, we've got alot of cornerbacks, maybe convert Damian Swann to FS as many projected him prior to the draft... And don't forget that we'll have Erik Harris and Jimmy Pruitt returning from Injured Reserve; Pruitt was also playing FS and was like a Payton redshirt... And who knows if Pruitt plays well enough, we can wait and cut Byrd or even better, trade him, at the end of camp... |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Vonn Bell is already making the calls to adjust coverage in the secondary so what exactly is Byrd good for at this point?!
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
My concern is that he'd be a negative influence in the locker room... Kenny Vaccaro's quote at the beginning of the season about wanting to be great really is coming back to me now... |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Has there been any indication that Byrd isn't good in the locker room?
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
For Christ sake, get someone who can rush the damn QB finally....
We'll pick in the top 10. SHould be easy. |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
And are you referring to John Jenkins? He was released over a month ago. Saints release defensive lineman John Jenkins, source confirms | NOLA.com |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
school of hard knocks. |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
For those who believe in stats from PFF's, Byrd had top defensive grades this week. The dynamic we have with the 3 safeties is working pretty well and we'd be remiss to not try to keep that together next year.
We've had other guys take pay cuts in the past, so it shouldn't be out of the question here. From a financial and on the field standpoint, it benefits everyone to keep him, work out a pay restructure (he'd probably still make more here than if he hit the open market, so we have leverage), and keep him another year. Then, in 2018 possibly cut him loose ;). In my opinion, the current safety position is a strength on this team. |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Let's see if he makes it through the season first.
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
What is the quandry? send his ass packing. throw a jug of milk back there, it would be more effective.
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Restructure and keep him. He finally looks healthy and could be a solid contributor next year.
If he doesn't want to restructure, then adios muchacho! |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Am I the only one who wants Delvin Breaux to find another team that guys cost us more in penalties than any other corner back in the league. He is horrible in coverage and can't seem to keep his hands off of receivers. He needs to be the first one cut.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
Welcome to the board. |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
I don't know what you mean by "SR". I'm not judgmental of his passion for the game, but rather his stats. I'm just not seeing him help more than he is hurting the team. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
We will soon see, I would love to be proven wrong and I would love for him to play the game without getting so many pass interference calls. It's not his physical ability to run with receivers nor his ability to play aggressive that is in question. But rather his ability to keep his hands off of wide receivers and to get his head turned around to make a play on the ball that, I have not seen from him yet. Again, I truly hope that I am wrong in that going into next year, if he is still on the team, he can get his head around to make a play on the ball and not grab and pull receivers. If he does not stop that behavior no matter what he will be released from the team. One other thing, I would love for him to get out of the number one spot for most penalized corner back in the league. The team cannot afford those 15 yard penalties that seem to always be at the wrong time. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
|
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
See NFL penalty tracker link below. All Players - 2016 - NFL Penalty Stats Tracker - List/Statistics/Data of NFL Penalties - 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 By the way, welcome to B&G :bng: |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
They'll be good guards in the mid rounds as well... Don't understand national pundits having us go after CB... Sign RG Kevin Zeitler, and we can pretty much let the good players fall to us in the draft... |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
He is the best CB on the team and is playing his second year in the league. I think he'll be fine if he can stay healthy. |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
I agree that we have to get after the QB, C. Jordan is playing well and does get after the QB. However, most of the time he has 2 to 3 people defending him and without someone to draw some of this attention he will be a non factor most of the game. Better cover guys can help this effort by playing smart and not being behind the sticks on 3rd downs (Defensive Coordinator). Letting teams catch the ball 5 to 7 yards in front of us when they need 7 to 8 yards for a first down is a gamble that continues to hurt us. We have to have cover guys that can pay Man Coverage in these situations and not use their hands beyond the 5 yard allowance. This is my issue with D. Breaux. No doubt he is good but he has to get his head around and go after the ball. I am simply not seeing him elevate his game. (I was mistaken in and earlier post when I said he was the most penalized CB. he is not). His play is hurting frustrating in so many ways I could right a book about it. PLAY THE BALL! DON'T TOUCH PULL AT THE RECEIVERS! I digress. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Re: The 2017 Byrd quandary
Quote:
I hope you are right... I really do. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com