Saints sign Hodge! Saints sign Hodge!!!

JKool · 03-23-2005, 09:41 AM

Two things:

(1) Danno, we agree.

(2) Why do people keep saying this: \"we didn\'t address the LB position?\" That is ambiguous; it could mean (what I think people mean and should say) that we didn\'t add an impact player at LB, or it could mean that we didn\'t even try to make an improvement. This is why people get upset about this kind of statement - we TRIED to get Peirce, we signed Fisher, we retained Hodge. We did \"address\" the position, at least in one sense. Now, I\'m not excited about what they DID ACTUALLY do, but I don\'t think it is true that they didn\'t even try. (Who, incase you thought this was directed to your post, it wasn\'t.

)

03-23-2005, 09:41 AM	#21
JKool 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 2,423	Saints sign Hodge! Saints sign Hodge!!! Two things: (1) Danno, we agree. (2) Why do people keep saying this: \"we didn\'t address the LB position?\" That is ambiguous; it could mean (what I think people mean and should say) that we didn\'t add an impact player at LB, or it could mean that we didn\'t even try to make an improvement. This is why people get upset about this kind of statement - we TRIED to get Peirce, we signed Fisher, we retained Hodge. We did \"address\" the position, at least in one sense. Now, I\'m not excited about what they DID ACTUALLY do, but I don\'t think it is true that they didn\'t even try. (Who, incase you thought this was directed to your post, it wasn\'t. )
	"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks