![]() |
Let's make one side of the ball dominant?!
Draft the best player available among the need positions - maybe that\'s what you\'re saying?
Very hard to get excited about defensive players that will be available when we pick. If a trade for DJ is unsuccessful and Brown is there - take him. The Saints with Brooks under center will never be a truly dominant team. Just too unpredictable, unlike the two teams that come to mind where it pretty much works/worked - the Colts and the Rams. Warner and Manning play/ed at a constantly high level with a support cast that\'s better than what the Saints have now. The point is: Who makes your team better? Who gives you the best chance to win, this year and the following years? Draft that player, never mind if he plays offense or defense. |
Let's make one side of the ball dominant?!
Quote:
I do not believe in drafting the \"best avaliable player.\" But I do believe in drafting the \"best avaliable player\" based on NEED! For instance ... if the \"best avaliable player\" is a DE, we should not sign him ... ;) |
Let's make one side of the ball dominant?!
How would you all feel about the Saints trading Howard and the 16th pick to Tennessee for the 6th and their third? I like the idea.
|
Let's make one side of the ball dominant?!
Quote:
|
Let's make one side of the ball dominant?!
Quote:
Can anyone name the last time a DE was traded for a 1st and a 3rd in the same draft? Three players considered best of their generation have been traded in the last 2 years (Moss, Owens, Dillon) and none of the three were traded for a 1st round pick, much less a 1st and a 3rd. Tennesee dumped all of their high priced talent. Howard wants a $35 mil deal with a $16 mil bonus. I\'d feel like I was smoking some really good stuff. I\'d want to share. SFIAH |
Let's make one side of the ball dominant?!
Quote:
|
Let's make one side of the ball dominant?!
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com