DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

The Jets announced last week they were moving on from defensive end Muhammad Wilkerson, but it didn’t become official until Monday when Wilkerson was listed on the NFL’s transaction wire.

It was purely a housekeeping move as Wilkerson already had set up a visit with the Packers.

Wilkerson, 28, has only eight sacks in 28 games over the past two seasons.

He had 44.5 sacks in his seven seasons in New York after the Jets drafted him in the first round.

PFT

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Nope.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Thanks but No Thanks!!

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

K would much rather have Sheldon Richardson at the same 10 to 12 million it would take to sign him . We do need a DT to replace Fairley and shore up our rotation. Richardson is a more versatile player.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

True Dat! Dat presence up the middle would have put us over the top last year.:bng:

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Looks like Wilkerson is likely to sign with the Packers.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

In return, the Rams will reportedly receive a fourth- and sixth-round pick. They're also sending a 2019 seventh-round pick to the Giants.

WTF! I would've love for the saints to pull that trade

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl...cid=spartandhp

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Ian Rapoport
@RapSheet
Former #Jets DL Mo Wilkerson is leaving Green Bay after his #Packers visit and sources say he’s headed to visit the #Saints next. That’s an intriguing option for a rapidly improving D.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Talent wise he is on Cam Jordan level. There are some red flags. Prove it deal could be best option for both sides. Players these days bet on themselves and sign 1 year deals. Alshon Jeffery and Crabtree were rewarded with big extensions. Maybe Wilkerson can revive his career in Saints uniform. :)

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Don't know enough to say no on Mo.

Why not Danny Shelton since Browns let him leave as Free Agent?

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

He’s visiting the Saints.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...t-then-chiefs/

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

I’m not sure where Wilkerson would fit. The obvious answer would be the 1 or 3 technique. But I wonder... could he play strong side DE while Jordan plays more on the open end?

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Look there was lots of debate about Nick too, and I for one thought it was a bad signing. I was wrong. I think we kick the tires with the right deal. Maybe change of scenery is what the doctor ordered. I just keep thinking how much more bad ass this d would have been last year if Nick's heart had not broke. I will trust the front office, they got their mojo back

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Come on down Mo. He would allow us to draft a young NT to have possibly one of the best rotations on that front line in the league. Talk about deep on the ends and middle. The guy can play multiple positions on the line and is effective playing them all.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Danny isn't a free agent.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

I question Muhammad's desire. I'm all for improving the defensive front 7 but I'm not so sure about this guy.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Saints bringing in Muhammad Wilkerson on free-agent visit: source | NOLA.com

His versatility ...
https://www.ganggreennation.com/2015...ns-versatility

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

https://s14.postimg.org/yvxik1p0x/Sc...0.10.18_AM.png


Wilkerson=Fairley?

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Wilkerson would be a huge signing. Who the hell wanted to play for the Jets? They have sucked for so many years. Motivation is a big thing for guys like Mo, they already have the money, if he wants to win we should sign him.

If we get a motivated Wilkerson he can be a beast.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

He visited KC today...after visiting with the Saints. Redskins next.
Muhammad Wilkerson Schedules Visit With Redskins For Monday | NFLTradeRumors.co

Guess the Saints did not offer enough $.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Perhaps the Saints didn't want to offer him anything after speaking with him. It is a two way street after all. He does come with quite a bit of "extra baggage".

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Or his agent isn't in the negotiating phase yet. I've seen high profile agents in the past make numerous visits, then negotiate later. I think the term is called "meet and greet".

I'll trust the FO on whatever happens with this dude (not a fan of Mo) :rolleyes:.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

He's pretty versatile and has played inside and out.

I'd be surprised if he signed early with anyone as he is the epitome of a wild card. Market will set the price, but I could see him getting a very wide range of offers.

If he wants an incentive-laden deal like Sherman, I'd take him.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

March 12-14: Clubs are permitted to contact, and enter into contract negotiations with, the certified agents of players who will become Unrestricted Free Agents upon the expiration of their 2017 player contracts at 4:00 p.m., New York time, on March 14. However, a contract cannot be executed with a new club until 4:00 p.m., New York time, on March 14.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Muhammad Wilkerson doesn't fall under that since he was released by the Jets. That only applies to UFA's who are still under contract until March 14.

Re: DE Muhammad Wilkerson... should we?
 

Right contract and I'm all in. Big risk big reward. Motivation is the key. Motivated he is a difference maker. How much does he want it????