Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

Pryor turned down a four-year deal from the Browns last year worth about $32.5 million, and they immediately gave that money to Kenny Britt instead. Pryor then signed a one-year deal with the Redskins, worth $6 million, but suffered an ankle injury in week two that derailed his season. He finished with 20 catches for 240 yards and a TD.

Browns are still in the mix for Terrelle Pryor even though he's visiting the Seahawks and Jets | cleveland.com

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

I was for it last year but he looked awful. Many drops then complaining about targets. Where he shines is on bad teams. If they are way behind he's going to get lots of work. DB's are also not covering very tight.

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

We aren’t officially thin. We do need to upgrade the #2 position

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

Hurns, Wallace, Decker, Meredith available and a 8-9 WR's already signed, but no news that we are even talking to anyone...
makes me think we either feel like we are set or are planning on drafting one

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

Word on him is he does not like getting hit. Nobody does obviously but he's not one to sacrifice his body from what people are saying like a Colston or Thomas. Likely still learning the tricks of the trade like protecting ribs. One game last year he was complaining about some trivial hit on him about DB should have tackled him or hit him in a safer spot hahahhaaa! Yeah, ok buddy.

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

I think he is a one year wonder. I'd bring back Coleman before signing him.

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

Bring back Lance Moore!

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

No. I wonder why there is so much fascination over a 3rd wide receiver. If Brandon Coleman can do exactly what he did last year without fumbling the ball, and Snead can come back and play even half of what he did in 2016, then there's no need for more receivers.

The 3rd receiver needs special skillsets. Coleman became a phenominal blocker. Snead in his career was a 3rd down catch machine.

Real football isn't fantasy. You cannot have all-pros in every position on the field. I don't see why the Saints need to spend a ton of money for an All-Pro as the 3rd receiver.

SFIAH

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

This is a great fit for Pryor. A bad team that will be playing from behind often just like the Browns. He will get plenty of targets with laid back coverage late in the game. Probably even play QB if they get in an injury jam. Amazing athlete but the attitude of a titty baby 12 yr old.

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

Good luck and all that crap................

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

Did you just say that the Saints are a bad team that will be playing from behind often just like the Browns? What the hell are you smoking, man?

:smokin:

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

Believe it or not, a lot of fans judge players based on what they do in Madden or Fantasy Football each week :rolleyes:.

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

Jets.

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

Our third receiver will be the Tight and we draft him around one

Re: Terrelle Pryor ... should we now since we're thin at WR?
 

I could see this being reality. Looking at draft projections, most of the solid Dline players will be gone. Why not go with the forgotten man and there are some good ones, certainly better than the WR prospects which are weak this year.