![]() |
Familiarity with Benjamin Watson doesn't hurt, but Saints signed him more for his ability
|
Re: Familiarity with Benjamin Watson doesn't hurt, but Saints signed him more for his ability
He still has to make the team.
|
Re: Familiarity with Benjamin Watson doesn't hurt, but Saints signed him more for his ability
Some people want to trade Ingram....I want to extend his contract. He is a locker room leader and a really good guy. His running style fits this offense beautifully and mixes well with Kamara.
Ingram doesn't go down easily but there was no getting away from that dog.....he was on the ground with very little energy. The dog simply spun him around and Ingram's inertia carried him forward and down. Good fun was had by all! Dilly Dilly! :p |
Re: Familiarity with Benjamin Watson doesn't hurt, but Saints signed him more for his ability
Quote:
|
Re: Familiarity with Benjamin Watson doesn't hurt, but Saints signed him more for his ability
We were at or near bottom in TE production statistics last season and yet we came within one play of the NFC Title game...
Just Ben Watson in the mix could be a huge difference... |
Re: Familiarity with Benjamin Watson doesn't hurt, but Saints signed him more for his ability
If he is only 75% of what he was when he left he will still be 3 times better than what we had at the position last year.
|
Re: Familiarity with Benjamin Watson doesn't hurt, but Saints signed him more for his ability
Not that I'd defend Fleener as I've been critical of his signing from the start, but with the emergence of the RB, there were fewer opportunities...
I'm not sure our offense needs a bell cow at tight end as in days of Jimmy, so much as a big target on third downs and red zone plays... |
Re: Familiarity with Benjamin Watson doesn't hurt, but Saints signed him more for his ability
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com