CB Patrick Peterson ... Should We?

CharityMike · 10-20-2018, 08:33 PM

The second it was said they are shopping him, Micky should have been on the phone. Even at the back end of his career, he is better than every DB on our team not named Lattimore. This seems like a no brainer to try to get it done. We are suppose to be in SB or bust mode.

rezburna · 10-21-2018, 06:06 AM

Originally Posted by CharityMike

The second it was said they are shopping him, Micky should have been on the phone. Even at the back end of his career, he is better than every DB on our team not named Lattimore. This seems like a no brainer to try to get it done. We are suppose to be in SB or bust mode.

He’s better than Lattimore too. They remind me of each other. Peterson is just stronger, but they’re both much better playing bump and run then off man or zone.

And if the Raiders are shopping Gareon Conley, see what’s up with the trade.

jeanpierre · 10-21-2018, 06:53 AM

Originally Posted by rezburna

He’s better than Lattimore too. They remind me of each other. Peterson is just stronger, but they’re both much better playing bump and run then off man or zone.

And if the Raiders are shopping Gareon Conley, see what’s up with the trade.

Chuck put it out he wants two firsts, but most feel he's looking for like a first and third, maybe fourth...

Conley real estate isn't worth a first, even if we had it...

Peterson is definitely worth two No. 2's, maybe a fourth in return...

Wonder if they'd take a player to be named later (Armstead) after the season?

We'd get some cap room for Peterson, move a younger Ramczyk to LT, extend Peat...

10-20-2018, 08:33 PM	#1
CharityMike Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Mid City, New Orleans Posts: 3,556	Re: CB Patrick Peterson ... Should We? The second it was said they are shopping him, Micky should have been on the phone. Even at the back end of his career, he is better than every DB on our team not named Lattimore. This seems like a no brainer to try to get it done. We are suppose to be in SB or bust mode.

10-21-2018, 06:06 AM	#2
rezburna 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Kenner, LA Posts: 8,120	Re: CB Patrick Peterson ... Should We? Originally Posted by CharityMike The second it was said they are shopping him, Micky should have been on the phone. Even at the back end of his career, he is better than every DB on our team not named Lattimore. This seems like a no brainer to try to get it done. We are suppose to be in SB or bust mode. He’s better than Lattimore too. They remind me of each other. Peterson is just stronger, but they’re both much better playing bump and run then off man or zone. And if the Raiders are shopping Gareon Conley, see what’s up with the trade. CharityMike likes this.

10-21-2018, 06:53 AM	#3
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: CB Patrick Peterson ... Should We? Originally Posted by rezburna He’s better than Lattimore too. They remind me of each other. Peterson is just stronger, but they’re both much better playing bump and run then off man or zone. And if the Raiders are shopping Gareon Conley, see what’s up with the trade. Chuck put it out he wants two firsts, but most feel he's looking for like a first and third, maybe fourth... Conley real estate isn't worth a first, even if we had it... Peterson is definitely worth two No. 2's, maybe a fourth in return... Wonder if they'd take a player to be named later (Armstead) after the season? We'd get some cap room for Peterson, move a younger Ramczyk to LT, extend Peat... rezburna likes this.