hitta |
06-04-2020 08:19 PM |
Re: How did Brees opinion go from being valid to invalid so quickly?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beastmode
(Post 890107)
Lebron has a HS diploma. He's ignorant on every topic except basketball. Best in life not to listen to the uneducated and ignorant on any topic unless you like agreeing and shaking hands with stupidity.
|
I don't think Lebron is a bad person. I think he means well. I think he tries to do a lot of good for people in the community and I believe his actions in this regard to be genuine. I just believe he has a very limited perspective. He's seen the polar extremes of what the US has to offer. He was born into a poor family(probably experienced his fair share of social injustice). Then suddenly he was the center of the basketball universe. Even guys like Jordan, Magic, Bird, etc, had to deal with coaches that taught them very valuable lessons on and off the court, whereas Lebron has kind of been his own coach, always got everything kind of tailored to him. He hasn't had to deal with the differences and subtleties of other people and and the main issue: learning to adapt and change to things around him. As a result I don't think he is very bright when it comes to seeing the subtleties that are involved in life. He takes a very black/white(not in a racial sense) viewpoint on everything and has a very hard time seeing the grey area in things. I think a lot of time it is easy to criticize people like Lebron in a general manner, because because people like him have deep and embedded character issues pervades throughout their entire social persona. I think as a society we need to stop ourselves from this, which is a very hard thing to do. Social media makes it every difficult as we have all of this information going all over the place. We don't look at things deeply. Just like with Brees and what he stated yesterday we need to get to the bottom of why Lebron thinks the way he does and actually have a dialogue. The only thing from guys like Lebron that I don't think have any value is when he tries to silence others by telling them they need to keep quiet. This is him using his entitlement to try to restrict the ability of others to express themselves, or just blatantly attacking them without having any sort of reasoning for doing so.
Even when it comes to police brutality, I highly doubt that you have a ton of cops that are like "lets go out there and kill us some black people". It is so much more subtle than that, and a lot of it is probably unconscious. If I were to state that African Americans make up somewhere between 13%-20% of the countries population but account for 50% of the murderers, then use that as a reasoning as to why police kill African Americans at a higher rate... this would probably make most black people angry. Certain things have actually been demonstrated in scientific studies. People have more unconscious fears of black people and being assaulted/mugged than other races. This translates to cops as well and is probably very dependent on the higher crime rates that African Americans are prone to. Then you can ask questions as to why do African Americans commit crimes at such a high rate... poverty, being raised by single mothers, legal prejudices(black people are more likely to get higher prison sentences than white people), historical reasons, etc.... I mean everything plays into the big picture. If we can't actually discuss these things then we have no hope at all of ever solving the discord and the social imbalances which exist. We shouldn't be discouraging people from stating their opinion, we should be encouraging it and asking them to elaborate on it. This goes for both sides of the aisle. I don't believe Brees should have apologized for what he stated yesterday, I think he should have came back, elaborated on everything he believes in regards to the issue and try to get people to see things from his perspective. He should have also been open to receiving criticisms on those perspectives that he offered up. We live in this society where it is so easy for people to communicate ideas with each other technology wise, yet for some reason it is as if we are system overloaded or something and can't filter things and have real, intricate conversations. If we can get people to elaborate more, we can look at two people's opinion and see the roots in which the juxtaposition sprout from. If we can establish those roots, we can look at it from a deeper analytical perspective and find ways to get people on the same page.
|