|
|||||||
this is a discussion within the Poli-Sci Community Forum; U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor today regarding his proposal to give Democrats an opportunity to vote on the President’s $1.6 trillion tax hike plan. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid objected to ...
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort Alabama
Posts: 10,975
|
Democrat Harry Reid refuses to let Senate Vote on Obama's Tax Hike Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Saint Historian
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick & steel of a nondescript building..
Posts: 1,201
|
Re: Democrat Harry Reid refuses to let Senate Vote on Obama's Tax Hike Plan
All this sham is about is to try to piss off enough people to give the House and a Senate supermajority back to the Democrats so we can have more of the 1st two years of Obama's tyrannical regime.
They are hoping come 2014 that they have all 5 keys to our liberty and private property (they already have 4 - White House, Senate, Supreme Court - Roberts is a closet liberal, and the bureaucratic/administrative machine). |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Site Donor
|
Re: Democrat Harry Reid refuses to let Senate Vote on Obama's Tax Hike Plan
This has been a big part of the problem. As much as the Dems have declared the Repubs as being obstructionists, so have Harry Reid & Nancy Pelosi prevented the process from going forward. It's a stupid little f@#king game being played by millionaires over who will run the country ... and we're the f@#king pawns. Obama's never bothered me that much, per say, it's Pelosi & Reid that have always concerned me.
The reason Reid won't allow anything to come to the Senate floor for vote is because he knows he has too many blue-dog Democratic Senators who will not vote along party lines and that will fracture the illusion of solidarity the Democrats so desperately need to maintain ... it's all smoke & mirrors. “Democrats are so focused on the politics of this debate they seem to forget there’s a cost. They’re feeling so good about the election, they’ve forgotten they’ve got a duty to govern. “A lot of people are going to suffer a lot if we go off this cliff. "A duty to govern" ... I think it's a point that has been lost on our elected officials ... and I don't think 'a lot of people are going to suffer a lot if we go over this cliff' ... some will, but there's always casualties in war, eh? I think it's smoke & mirrors, a manufactured emergency these guys use as a talking point to try and force their own agendas. |
|
... this space intentionally left blank ...
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|