Star receiver? Morgan is facing third team guys like Elbert Mack. Let's keep things in perspective.

I don't believe everything I read on canalstreetchronicles
Any credible sources reporting from camp?

"Scott Shanle says the Saints defense is stylistically similar to that of former Saints defensive coordinator Gary Gibbs."

I think there's your answer Halo,

Nuff said

Who else have you heard about mostly other than Morgan and AA?

"It's going to be a huge change. About every scheme thing imaginable is completely flip-flopped," said linebacker Scott Shanle, who said Spagnuolo's approach "takes me back to '06, '07 and '08" when Gary Gibbs was running the Saints' defense.

"I'm not saying we're going to play like that defense," Shanle quickly reassured - which is a good thing since the Saints gave up way too many big plays without making nearly enough of their own in that era. "But that's the kind of scheme that people really can expect to see."

New Orleans Saints defense should be more versatile, less predictable under Steve Spagnuolo - New Orleans Saints Football NFL News - NOLA.com

Canal Street Chronicles isn't a "source." They aren't reporters. They're just fans with a blog, reading and reacting to the same things you read. A bit more intelligently. Perhaps you should take the time to understand what you are talking about before speaking.

You should absolutely believe everything you read on Canal Street Chronicles. They are only gathering and using information that comes from credible sources. Like the Scott Shanle quote above which you believed not to be true when obviously it is. You are only making yourself look like an uniformed fan.

You are hearing more about those guys because they're on the roster bubble, fighting for a roster spot. It makes for good content and it's what people want to read.

Hold up. I just realized something. Are you on here to bash because we don't agree or like what another website is saying? I am assuming you are from that site then no?

Why should we beleive eveything we read over there and not here? Last I checked this was our forum..if you don't like what we are saying then leave. Which is exactly what the MAJORITY of us here do with regards to CSC.

You may say whatever you want about CSC whether positive or negative, I really don't care. But whatever is said should be based in fact.

Some people seem to have the idea that CSC is a "source" of Saints information, as if they are the media. They are not the media. They don't break news. They don't have access to the team. I have seen many people on this board bash CSC for not being a legitimate "source" of news when that isn't even what they're trying to do. It's a blog. It's opinion, just like everything here.

This thread is a perfect example. Seer1 used the Scott Shanle bit from CSC to illustrate that you can't believe everything on CSC. But that's exactly what Shanle said. CSC didn't make it up.

Well maybe that is where the confusion is then. I have never thought of them as a "source". They are a blog. As far as I know, the folks here don't like the site because of the people that blog. I have never seen a reference here regarding them as being a source. Maybe I just wasn't paying attention.

Halo said in this very thread: "Any credible sources reporting from camp?"