3rd Wide

JKool · 03-07-2005, 04:44 PM

Ok, I know we all expect great things from Gardner, Henderson, and Stallworth, but I was wondering what you guys think about these options:

(1) Burress? Probably too expensive to be a number two or three, but are there other reasons not too look?

(2) David Patten:

David Patten is a legitimate threat in the vertical passing game due to his speed, quickness, and ability retains his momentum with the ball in the air. Though undersized, Patten utilizes his body well to keep a defender from the ball. His ability to find the zone and seams in coverage has enhanced his production and ability to make the big play with regularity. Patten does not posses the ability to fight for the high-ball and can be out-muscled in press coverage. He should remain a viable option as a spot receiver for a team seeking depth and a downfield threat.

(3) Tai Streets:

Signed by Detroit as an unrestricted free-agent in 2004. Former Wolverine returns to the state after spending the previous five seasons with San Francisco. Had best season in 2002 after tallying 72 receptions for 756 yards and five TD's. Tall, physical receiver with good fluid movement and soft hands.

(4) Kevin Johnson?

Link: http://scout.scout.com

Perhaps WR is just not worth addressing? What do you guys think?

What about the chances of re-signing Pathon to a cheaper contract?

saintswhodi · 03-07-2005, 04:47 PM

Patten signed with the Skins. And IMO, we shouldn\'t address it at all unless we trade Joe. Definitely can not afford Buress. I think we are fine with Joe, Stall, Henderson, and Gardner with Lewis. Pathon could be signed back for less, but I read Atlanta had interest.

WhoDat · 03-07-2005, 04:48 PM

That\'s exactly the route we should go. Resign the guy if he\'s willing to come back at a lower price. If not, I think we have to find somebody somewhere. I\'m not convinced by Henderson, Gardner, D. Lewis, M. Lewis... even Stallworth. I like Nathan Black as the 3rd WR personally - but then I have an affinity for white-boy WRs.

saintswhodi · 03-07-2005, 04:50 PM

but then I have an affinity for white-boy WRs.

TMI.

shadowdrinker · 03-07-2005, 04:50 PM

Plax is bieng heavily pursued by the Vikes...with the loss of Moss..they really need him, and will likely pay big money to get him...

JKool · 03-07-2005, 04:52 PM

I thought Black was on Washington\'s roster?

How about Tai?

turbo_dog · 03-07-2005, 04:52 PM

Onomo Ojo!!! :sulkoff:

Bring back Willie Jack!!!

LKelley67 · 03-07-2005, 04:54 PM

plax too much money for what he is/does

patten signed with washington

i have never seen much in streets

johnson too much money for what he is also

all just imo

what about old troy brown? super bowl winning experience to bring to the team and can helpt the defense when needed, hehe

reggie swinton detroit should be cheap too, some tools but has never put it all together.

i cannot imagine pathon\'s door being beaten down with offers. him with an appropriate salary level would be fine with me too.

PS- I WAS GONE FOR A FEW DAYS N JUST BACK. WHAT A DIFFERENCE A FEW DAYS AND APLAYER OR TWO CAN MAKE, EH? WOOO, IF THEY SIGN A LINEBACKER SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE TO CHANGE MY DEPENDS. lol

FireVenturi · 03-07-2005, 05:28 PM

Onomo Ojo!!! :sulkoff:

Bring back Willie Jack!!!

I dont think we can afford Onome :P

CheramieIII · 03-07-2005, 07:28 PM

I think we\'re fine at WR, we need linebackers and defensive lineman more than anything else right now or maybe a backup QB. I mean a decent backup QB because what we have in Bouman is no more than a practice squad QB.

03-07-2005, 04:44 PM	#1
JKool 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 2,423	3rd Wide Ok, I know we all expect great things from Gardner, Henderson, and Stallworth, but I was wondering what you guys think about these options: (1) Burress? Probably too expensive to be a number two or three, but are there other reasons not too look? (2) David Patten: David Patten is a legitimate threat in the vertical passing game due to his speed, quickness, and ability retains his momentum with the ball in the air. Though undersized, Patten utilizes his body well to keep a defender from the ball. His ability to find the zone and seams in coverage has enhanced his production and ability to make the big play with regularity. Patten does not posses the ability to fight for the high-ball and can be out-muscled in press coverage. He should remain a viable option as a spot receiver for a team seeking depth and a downfield threat. (3) Tai Streets: Signed by Detroit as an unrestricted free-agent in 2004. Former Wolverine returns to the state after spending the previous five seasons with San Francisco. Had best season in 2002 after tallying 72 receptions for 756 yards and five TD's. Tall, physical receiver with good fluid movement and soft hands. (4) Kevin Johnson? Link: http://scout.scout.com Perhaps WR is just not worth addressing? What do you guys think? What about the chances of re-signing Pathon to a cheaper contract?

03-07-2005, 04:47 PM	#2
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	3rd Wide Patten signed with the Skins. And IMO, we shouldn\'t address it at all unless we trade Joe. Definitely can not afford Buress. I think we are fine with Joe, Stall, Henderson, and Gardner with Lewis. Pathon could be signed back for less, but I read Atlanta had interest.

03-07-2005, 04:48 PM	#3
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	3rd Wide That\'s exactly the route we should go. Resign the guy if he\'s willing to come back at a lower price. If not, I think we have to find somebody somewhere. I\'m not convinced by Henderson, Gardner, D. Lewis, M. Lewis... even Stallworth. I like Nathan Black as the 3rd WR personally - but then I have an affinity for white-boy WRs.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631

03-07-2005, 04:50 PM	#4
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	3rd Wide but then I have an affinity for white-boy WRs. TMI.

03-07-2005, 04:50 PM	#5
shadowdrinker Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 517	3rd Wide Plax is bieng heavily pursued by the Vikes...with the loss of Moss..they really need him, and will likely pay big money to get him...
shadowdrinker Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 517

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-07-2005, 04:52 PM	#6
JKool 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 2,423	3rd Wide I thought Black was on Washington\'s roster? How about Tai?

03-07-2005, 04:52 PM	#7
turbo_dog 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Atlanta Posts: 1,541	3rd Wide Onomo Ojo!!! :sulkoff: Bring back Willie Jack!!!

03-07-2005, 04:54 PM	#8
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	3rd Wide plax too much money for what he is/does patten signed with washington i have never seen much in streets johnson too much money for what he is also all just imo what about old troy brown? super bowl winning experience to bring to the team and can helpt the defense when needed, hehe reggie swinton detroit should be cheap too, some tools but has never put it all together. i cannot imagine pathon\'s door being beaten down with offers. him with an appropriate salary level would be fine with me too. PS- I WAS GONE FOR A FEW DAYS N JUST BACK. WHAT A DIFFERENCE A FEW DAYS AND APLAYER OR TWO CAN MAKE, EH? WOOO, IF THEY SIGN A LINEBACKER SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE TO CHANGE MY DEPENDS. lol

03-07-2005, 05:28 PM	#9
FireVenturi Cold as Ice! Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Da Big Easy Posts: 2,978	3rd Wide Onomo Ojo!!! :sulkoff: Bring back Willie Jack!!! I dont think we can afford Onome :P

03-07-2005, 07:28 PM	#10
CheramieIII Fan Since 1967 Join Date: May 2004 Location: Nomad Posts: 7,460 Blog Entries: 3	3rd Wide I think we\'re fine at WR, we need linebackers and defensive lineman more than anything else right now or maybe a backup QB. I mean a decent backup QB because what we have in Bouman is no more than a practice squad QB.