Hebert challenges Les Miles

BIGEASY504 · 01-10-2012, 11:56 AM

I think the 7 int Lee thrown in previous meeting with 'Bama played into Lee not playing

Mardigras9 · 01-12-2012, 03:13 PM

Originally Posted by BIGEASY504

I think the 7 int Lee thrown in previous meeting with 'Bama played into Lee not playing

Although I love Bobby for calling him out, this was the biggest factor. Lee already proved he was ineffective against Bama. Wouldn't have mattered anyway.

papz · 01-13-2012, 09:09 AM

Originally Posted by Mardigras9

Although I love Bobby for calling him out, this was the biggest factor. Lee already proved he was ineffective against Bama. Wouldn't have mattered anyway.

The difference is they game planned solely to stop Jefferson and the option... which was supposedly Bama's Achilles heel. It was obvious we needed to take more shots down field and run our traditional pro style offense we've been running. Whether or not Lee would have been effective or not, we'll never know. What we do know is that we needed a spark and make more plays down field... something Lee is better at. There was nothing to lose by making the change.

Just because Lee was ineffective against Bama the first time around didn't mean he would fail the second time around. Look what happened to Jefferson.

QBREES9 · 01-17-2012, 11:18 PM

Originally Posted by Mardigras9

Although I love Bobby for calling him out, this was the biggest factor. Lee already proved he was ineffective against Bama. Wouldn't have mattered anyway.

Jefferson couldn't do a thing. You still give Lee a shot.

01-10-2012, 11:56 AM	#1
BIGEASY504 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 487	I think the 7 int Lee thrown in previous meeting with 'Bama played into Lee not playing
BIGEASY504 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 487

01-12-2012, 03:13 PM	#2
Mardigras9 Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Land Mass between LA and AL Posts: 4,375	Originally Posted by BIGEASY504 I think the 7 int Lee thrown in previous meeting with 'Bama played into Lee not playing Although I love Bobby for calling him out, this was the biggest factor. Lee already proved he was ineffective against Bama. Wouldn't have mattered anyway.

01-13-2012, 09:09 AM	#3
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,799	Originally Posted by Mardigras9 Although I love Bobby for calling him out, this was the biggest factor. Lee already proved he was ineffective against Bama. Wouldn't have mattered anyway. The difference is they game planned solely to stop Jefferson and the option... which was supposedly Bama's Achilles heel. It was obvious we needed to take more shots down field and run our traditional pro style offense we've been running. Whether or not Lee would have been effective or not, we'll never know. What we do know is that we needed a spark and make more plays down field... something Lee is better at. There was nothing to lose by making the change. Just because Lee was ineffective against Bama the first time around didn't mean he would fail the second time around. Look what happened to Jefferson.
	Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege. All little common sense goes a long way.

01-17-2012, 11:18 PM	#4
QBREES9 Moderator Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Haven Ct Posts: 23,990	Originally Posted by Mardigras9 Although I love Bobby for calling him out, this was the biggest factor. Lee already proved he was ineffective against Bama. Wouldn't have mattered anyway. Jefferson couldn't do a thing. You still give Lee a shot.