This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For

TheOak · 01-17-2013, 09:18 AM

Official White House Response to Secure resources and funding, and begin construction of a Death Star by 2016.
This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For

By Paul Shawcross
The Administration shares your desire for job creation and a strong national defense, but a Death Star isn't on the horizon. Here are a few reasons:

The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.
The Administration does not support blowing up planets.
Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?

Read More https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/res...-youre-looking

To the Bullet Points:

1. Really now?!?!?!?! Also i need to see the math, it doesnt look like you factotred in the cheap Mexican immigrant labor. By my calculations it would cost the United States $43.27
2. Prove it. Also you are looking at it all wrong, if you move heavy industrial to the Death Star we no longer pollute the Earth with it.
3. Why deviate from your standard practice of spending tax payers dollars on items with fundamental flaws? By electing a President with a fundamental flaw (No executive management experience), aren't we a Nation lead by a fundamental flaw?

foreverfan · 01-17-2013, 09:30 AM

QBREES9 · 01-18-2013, 03:53 PM

Foreverfan !!!!

Crusader · 01-18-2013, 05:06 PM

I can't see the picture?

01-17-2013, 09:18 AM	#1
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,026	This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For Official White House Response to Secure resources and funding, and begin construction of a Death Star by 2016. This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For By Paul Shawcross The Administration shares your desire for job creation and a strong national defense, but a Death Star isn't on the horizon. Here are a few reasons: The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it. The Administration does not support blowing up planets. Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship? Read More https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/res...-youre-looking To the Bullet Points: 1. Really now?!?!?!?! Also i need to see the math, it doesnt look like you factotred in the cheap Mexican immigrant labor. By my calculations it would cost the United States $43.27 2. Prove it. Also you are looking at it all wrong, if you move heavy industrial to the Death Star we no longer pollute the Earth with it. 3. Why deviate from your standard practice of spending tax payers dollars on items with fundamental flaws? By electing a President with a fundamental flaw (No executive management experience), aren't we a Nation lead by a fundamental flaw?
	It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau Last edited by TheOak; 01-17-2013 at 09:43 AM..

01-17-2013, 09:30 AM	#2
foreverfan 12,000 BS Posts Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Metairie, LA Posts: 13,457 Blog Entries: 5	Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For

01-18-2013, 03:53 PM	#3
QBREES9 Moderator Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Haven Ct Posts: 23,985	Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For Foreverfan !!!!

01-18-2013, 05:06 PM	#4
Crusader Resident Swede Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Märsta, Sweden Posts: 8,025	Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For I can't see the picture?

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey