![]() |
Re: What if?
[quote=saintfan;510509]
Quote:
|
Re: What if?
[quote=saintfan;510509]
Quote:
I blame it all on Goddell! Damn.... I put a lot of thought into that one also lol. I may be able to fix it in the morning, I think my work computer still has the page open with the original version. |
Re: What if?
[quote=TheOak;510536]
Quote:
|
Re: What if?
[quote=saintfan;510558]
Quote:
Your forgiven, twice. Go forth and multiply. |
Re: What if?
|
Re: What if?
Quote:
PS: Based upon the axiom that an enemy of my enemy is my friend, Attila was a Saints fan. Let's see if you can provide the logic why. |
Re: What if?
My gremlin'd post recovered
----------------------------------------------------- I place no distinction between human and the rest of the animals that populate the earth. Whales are beaching them selves naturally, and another animal (man) is interfering with natures harmonics. Albeit it is justified cause "they are so pretty to look at"... Man try's to play God or mother nature, however you wish to see it, to justify his own beliefs. Some actions interfere with nature, some are natural. Whales found on a beach - Man must interfere! Woodpecker found in a tree - Man must not interfere! Homosapien's desire to posses trophy's of Rhinoceros horns - Man must interfere! Mosquito's breed and reach nuisance levels - man must interfere! Sharks obliterate populations of seals - man must video and put it on the Discovery Channel. Coonasses obliterate populations of migratory fowl - man must interfere! If a herd of velociraptors and tyrannosaurus rexs were found to exist just outside of Detroit do ya think man would let them roam freely? Man applies his logic as he sees fit. I have very little faith in either religion or science... They are both someone justifying a paycheck. |
Re: What if?
What if these super forest fires that are burning up thousands of acres of our country periodically are man caused and a result from putting out forest fires and not allowing nature to burn off surface debris naturally?
|
Re: What if?
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
FYI. Many don't realize that fire "prevention" is also a major cause of desertification. Up until the 1800's large tracts of the southwest US were short grass prairie. Once man arrived and started farming and ranching, the belief was that grass fires destroyed the grassland that the cattle depended on. Unfortunately, the opposite is true. Most grasslands are sustained by fire. A fire quickly burns grassland which can re-sprout from the buried root structure and seeds after the first rainfall. Shrubs, saplings, etc. take much longer to regrow after a grass fire. So, with periodic fires, the habitat becomes an established, regenerative grassland. Man's intervention resulted in the grasslands being overrun with slower growing, invasive species such as creosote, sage, mesquite, etc. that crowd-out grasses. When spring rains appeared the lack of the grass root structure resulted in erosion of the thin top soil, permanently damaging the ecosystem and expanding the SW US deserts. So, fires were actually beneficial to the farmer and cattlemen. Similarly, fires are essential to sustaining the south Louisiana marsh ecosystems. |
Re: What if?
PS: This means that today's big forest fires have little if anything to do with global warming, especially since global warming does't exist except in Al's mind.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com