Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Everything Else
View Poll Results: Do You Believe Stanley Kubrick Confesses To Faking The Moon Landings?
Our Government with ABC, CBS and NBC would never lie about this so I believe everything. 1 25.00%
Our Government with ABC, CBS and ABC faked the whole thing. 2 50.00%
I want the Falcons to win the Superbowl. 1 25.00%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

Stanley Kubrick Confesses To Faking The Moon Landings

this is a discussion within the Everything Else Community Forum; Originally Posted by burningmetal Yes, my friend, I'm afraid so. World Trade Center numbers 3 and 5 were also destroyed as a result of falling debris and subsequent fire damage, along with over a dozen other buildings that were either ...

Like Tree4Likes

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-02-2017, 08:06 PM   #10
12,000 BS Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 13,457
Blog Entries: 5
Re: Stanley Kubrick Confesses To Faking The Moon Landings

Originally Posted by burningmetal View Post
Yes, my friend, I'm afraid so.

World Trade Center numbers 3 and 5 were also destroyed as a result of falling debris and subsequent fire damage, along with over a dozen other buildings that were either destroyed or damaged.

So, given that all of these buildings were being destroyed, it's not difficult to imagine how a foreign reporter who likely had no idea which buildings are which, could have mistakenly stated the wrong building. How many of us had any clue about any of the other buildings, aside from the twin towers, before that day? Probably not many, because no one really cared. That reporter should have been more careful to make sure she got the right building, but we all know the media wants to report first and fact check later. If they ever fact check at all.

So that is hardly a smoking gun, certainly in my opinion. But the bigger issue I have, is what does the collapse of building 7 prove to anyone? If the twin towers were supposedly blown up (which is equally lacking in facts) and the planes were just flown into the buildings to distract people from "the truth", then why cause building 7 to fall WITHOUT any planes? How is that supposed to help their cause?

I've heard theories about the government wanting to blow it up to destroy evidence of their plot that might have been hidden there... Couldn't they just use a shredder or a burn pile, without blowing up an entire building? It makes no sense.

But there was zero evidence of any explosives found at that site. I have a couple of different sources that can pretty easily explain the collapse of building 7 as well as the twin towers. It really is common sense to me when it comes to the twin towers, but for conspiracy theorists, they want more, and when you show them more they say "that's what they want you to believe", without really considering the probability of what the reports suggest, and putting it to the common sense test.

They ignore it and come up with a different theory, instead. Here's one link, and if you wish to continue the conversation, I'd be happy to go further. World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest
Explain how building 7 (STEEL) fell at the same speed as someone jumping out the window?
WTC 1 & 2 both fell as the same speed. IMPOSSIBLE.

That my friend is impossible to explain unless you have controlled demolition.

Sorry... I believe what is in front of my eyes. My dad was an architecture and was the VP of a steel building manufacture. He didn't believe it from the first day. When I talked to him, he said that was not possible.

foreverfan is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts