Gruden vs. Pereira

ScottF · 12-29-2011, 03:27 PM

maybe this is why penalty-calling blows; this guy is an a$$:

Pereira

Marlboro Man · 12-29-2011, 05:33 PM

Totally agree. However Pieriera was right about the two calls in question. One was helmet to helmet and the other was shoulder to back. Additionally though they didn't call the roughing the passer against Drew Brees and they also let the INT stand on the obvious defensive pass interference on Drew's second INT.

ScottF · 12-29-2011, 11:10 PM

I really thought the call on Lofton was weak. The coincidental contact of heads cannot be controlled, and we have been on the wrong end of it all year.

The refs iwere bad, and made to seem worse by the poor explanations. The non-safety call was even more, let's say 'curious' after the explanation, and they call the roughing on Lofton 'hitting a defenseless receiver.' Except that the receiver touched the ball a split-second earlier. Oh well, it's a W

12-29-2011, 03:27 PM	#1
ScottF 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 6,324	Gruden vs. Pereira maybe this is why penalty-calling blows; this guy is an a$$: Pereira

12-29-2011, 05:33 PM	#2
Marlboro Man 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,469	Totally agree. However Pieriera was right about the two calls in question. One was helmet to helmet and the other was shoulder to back. Additionally though they didn't call the roughing the passer against Drew Brees and they also let the INT stand on the obvious defensive pass interference on Drew's second INT.
	Last edited by Marlboro Man; 12-29-2011 at 05:38 PM..

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/nfl/39554-gruden-vs-pereira.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Gruden vs. Pereira	This thread	Refback	12-29-2011 03:33 PM	4

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

12-29-2011, 11:10 PM	#3
ScottF 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 6,324	I really thought the call on Lofton was weak. The coincidental contact of heads cannot be controlled, and we have been on the wrong end of it all year. The refs iwere bad, and made to seem worse by the poor explanations. The non-safety call was even more, let's say 'curious' after the explanation, and they call the roughing on Lofton 'hitting a defenseless receiver.' Except that the receiver touched the ball a split-second earlier. Oh well, it's a W