Falcons, are they easier prey for us under Koetter than Mularkey?

atltillidie · 08-20-2012, 05:31 PM

Originally Posted by 4thqtrsaint

IMO, the Falcons did nothing to get better. I doubt Dent will be an improvement over Lofton. Asante Samuel can't cover everybody. And people say the knock on the Saints D is they are learning a new system, yet nobody says that about ATL learning a new system on offense. Their passing may be better.

I see them as stagnant. I think the rest of the division got better. The only hurdle the Saints have is no Payton, but they have the guys in place to maintain enough continuity to be highly competitive. I'm more worried about Carolina taking the division than ATL.

Scheme changes made a big difference for us so far. The Panthers haven't even won a game against us under Cam Newton.

SaintsBro · 08-21-2012, 02:33 PM

Originally Posted by atltillidie

The Panthers haven't even won a game against us under Cam Newton.

Join the club. It's not that difficult to do. Is this one of those things like back-to-back winning seasons, that only a Falcons fan thinks is a really big deal.

Vrillon82 · 08-21-2012, 08:54 PM

Originally Posted by SaintsBro

Join the club. It's not that difficult to do. Is this one of those things like back-to-back winning seasons, that only a Falcons fan thinks is a really big deal.

They got low standards.

a Division champ in 2010 was like a SB to them.

as for the Panthers, I dont think they have beaten us since 2009 season unless I am mistaken and we dropped 1 to them late in the 2010 season.

08-20-2012, 05:31 PM	#1
atltillidie 100th Post Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Atlanta, Georgia Posts: 432	Re: Falcons, are they easier prey for us under Koetter than Mularkey? Originally Posted by 4thqtrsaint IMO, the Falcons did nothing to get better. I doubt Dent will be an improvement over Lofton. Asante Samuel can't cover everybody. And people say the knock on the Saints D is they are learning a new system, yet nobody says that about ATL learning a new system on offense. Their passing may be better. I see them as stagnant. I think the rest of the division got better. The only hurdle the Saints have is no Payton, but they have the guys in place to maintain enough continuity to be highly competitive. I'm more worried about Carolina taking the division than ATL. Scheme changes made a big difference for us so far. The Panthers haven't even won a game against us under Cam Newton.

08-21-2012, 02:33 PM	#2
SaintsBro Site Donor Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG Posts: 3,650 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Falcons, are they easier prey for us under Koetter than Mularkey? Originally Posted by atltillidie The Panthers haven't even won a game against us under Cam Newton. Join the club. It's not that difficult to do. Is this one of those things like back-to-back winning seasons, that only a Falcons fan thinks is a really big deal. \|Mitch\| likes this.

08-21-2012, 08:54 PM	#3
Vrillon82 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,127	Re: Falcons, are they easier prey for us under Koetter than Mularkey? Originally Posted by SaintsBro Join the club. It's not that difficult to do. Is this one of those things like back-to-back winning seasons, that only a Falcons fan thinks is a really big deal. They got low standards. a Division champ in 2010 was like a SB to them. as for the Panthers, I dont think they have beaten us since 2009 season unless I am mistaken and we dropped 1 to them late in the 2010 season.
Vrillon82 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,127

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/nfl/48467-falcons-they-easier-prey-us-under-koetter-than-mularkey.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
New Orleans Saints News \| NFL Football - LockerPulse	This thread	Refback	08-19-2012 09:20 AM	1
Falcons, are they easier prey for us under Koetter than Mularkey?	This thread	Refback	08-19-2012 09:18 AM	6