|
this is a discussion within the NFL Community Forum; based off of play and competition. I wager to say right now that Houston, Minnesota (big shock aint it?), San Fransisco, New England, and NY Giants are better than the Falcons. before the year ends, I am sure more will ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-24-2012, 12:35 AM | #11 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,127
|
Re: The Falcons Aren't For Real
based off of play and competition.
I wager to say right now that Houston, Minnesota (big shock aint it?), San Fransisco, New England, and NY Giants are better than the Falcons. before the year ends, I am sure more will hit that list, I can add the Saints because I know we would beat Atl as well. |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
10-24-2012, 03:37 AM | #12 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: The Falcons Aren't For Real
Originally Posted by Vrillon82
Add Chicago to that list. They are looking way better than the Falcons, particularly defensively. However, I think the Bears' age on defense will catch up to them down the stretch as it seems to every year. That and Cutler will probably get hurt again with as bad as his line is, and as long as he holds onto the ball.
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/nfl/51988-falcons-arent-real.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Falcons Aren't For Real | This thread | Refback | 10-16-2012 09:25 PM | 2 |