The Falcons Aren't For Real

burningmetal · 10-24-2012, 02:37 AM

Originally Posted by Vrillon82

based off of play and competition.

I wager to say right now that Houston, Minnesota (big shock aint it?), San Fransisco, New England, and NY Giants are better than the Falcons.

before the year ends, I am sure more will hit that list, I can add the Saints because I know we would beat Atl as well.

Add Chicago to that list. They are looking way better than the Falcons, particularly defensively. However, I think the Bears' age on defense will catch up to them down the stretch as it seems to every year. That and Cutler will probably get hurt again with as bad as his line is, and as long as he holds onto the ball.

10-24-2012, 02:37 AM	#12
burningmetal 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 3,923 Blog Entries: 3	Re: The Falcons Aren't For Real Originally Posted by Vrillon82 based off of play and competition. I wager to say right now that Houston, Minnesota (big shock aint it?), San Fransisco, New England, and NY Giants are better than the Falcons. before the year ends, I am sure more will hit that list, I can add the Saints because I know we would beat Atl as well. Add Chicago to that list. They are looking way better than the Falcons, particularly defensively. However, I think the Bears' age on defense will catch up to them down the stretch as it seems to every year. That and Cutler will probably get hurt again with as bad as his line is, and as long as he holds onto the ball.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/nfl/51988-falcons-arent-real.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Falcons Aren't For Real	This thread	Refback	10-16-2012 08:25 PM	2