For two years I was high on that team. But they disappointed both times. No one in that division has the gusto to beat Green Bay continually. Minnesota is probably going to be second because their defense did look good late and Charles Johnson really came on too. They have Wallace now as well and I don't think the Cassel experiement is over just yet. And AP is back. But they started figuring it out with the passing game. CP just had no chemistry with TB. Also, they got even better on defense this offseason(they drafted Wayans?). Chicago? I don't want to even get started on this team. That team's hope is if SD, KC, and StL(their road games the others being Seattle and TB) underperform. I don't see it happening. There's also a 4-3-2 pattern currently in the north that supports a vikings runner-up spot and lions being last. Though given GB having the strong teams at home, they probably will steamroll the division. Vikings have those teams at home as well, which is what factored in me picking them in second.

WTF.... Detroit did not sign him yet?

Yeah, you fell into the trap & which is why I never get too high on the Lions ... it's been going on since the sixties, . But you did pretty much nail the NFC North ... Minnesota is going to be the team to watch and no way they finish last with AP back on the field ... like you said though, you gotta' figure out how to beat GB consistently if you wanna' win that Division. Chicago/Detroit battle for the basement this year, IMO.



Nah, probably just a camp body if they do ... be a kinda' cool reunion considering they signed Lance Moore & have Joe Lombardi at OC ... I tell ya', y'all know where Drew Brees is going after he retires or is put out to pasture, don't ya'? ... if this trend of signing former Saints continues, I'm gonna' trade mark a slogan, something like "Who Dem?" or whatever's out there available.

Why not...Cincy is trying to steal it themselves with WhoDey...