Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints > NFL

Redskins win trademark dispute

this is a discussion within the NFL Community Forum; [quote=Tobias-Reiper;687339]Yeah, whatever. Yes. The government is not, and should not, be in the business of pushing religion in any way , shape, or form. Says so in the U.S. Constitution. Thats not what the constitution says. Granted, we don't make ...

Like Tree11Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-28-2015, 06:07 PM   #1
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,758
Re: Redskins win trademark dispute

[quote=Tobias-Reiper;687339]Yeah, whatever.
Yes. The government is not, and should not, be in the business of pushing religion in any way, shape, or form. Says so in the U.S. Constitution.

Thats not what the constitution says.

Granted, we don't make much if it because we have conveniently placed most Native Americans in reservations.
We did not "place" them there and no one is forcing them to stay.
Danno is offline  
Old 12-29-2015, 12:37 PM   #2
Merces Letifer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
Re: Redskins win trademark dispute

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper View Post
Yeah, whatever.
Yes. The government is not, and should not, be in the business of pushing religion in any way, shape, or form. Says so in the U.S. Constitution.
Thats not what the constitution says.
Don't take it from me.

" Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties."


We did not "place" them there and no one is forcing them to stay.
Sure... sure ...

'Cause the simple man pays the thrills, the bills and the pills that kill
Tobias-Reiper is offline  
Old 12-29-2015, 06:47 PM   #3
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,758
Re: Redskins win trademark dispute

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper View Post
Don't take it from me.

" Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties."
So what law did they make?
Danno is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts