|
this is a discussion within the NFL Community Forum; He had three whole carries for them. That's not much to go on. Seattle is a power running team. They rely on Wilson's legs, when healthy, the aforementioned running game and their defense. That's not an explosive offense. Their line ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#8 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Seahawks cut running back C.J.*Spiller
He had three whole carries for them. That's not much to go on.
Seattle is a power running team. They rely on Wilson's legs, when healthy, the aforementioned running game and their defense. That's not an explosive offense. Their line isn't what it was a couple of years ago, and they don't have Lynch anymore. Spiller isn't a back who fits that team. I'm surprised they signed him at all. The Saints knew what he was about, and we all assumed he would be used in the Sproles role. Instead they barely used him at all after he finally got on the field last year, and then, after he got healthy and looked like he had his explosion back, they released him. If they were worried about his ability to fit the system, they shouldn't have signed him. So yes, Guido, it was dumb of the Saints AND Seattle to sign him. |
If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/nfl/80135-seahawks-cut-running-back-c-j-spiller.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Seahawks cut running back C.J.*Spiller | This thread | Refback | 10-26-2016 05:00 PM | 2 |