|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; As far as I know, Baun was potentially going to play Mike LB. I don’t know if that plan is still in place or not....
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,482
|
Re: 2021 NFL Draft: New Orleans Saints
As far as I know, Baun was potentially going to play Mike LB. I don’t know if that plan is still in place or not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: 2021 NFL Draft: New Orleans Saints
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
![]()
Originally Posted by gosaints1
![]()
Originally Posted by ChrisXVI
Look, that's just me; I see him excelling in that (Jack) position...![]()
Could he play Sam, Mike or Will? Sure. But I think you put this guy in as a Jack, he could devastate one side of the field, reach his full potential... In fact, I'd go so far as to say that Anzalone would probably make a better 3-4 LBer just to reduce some of his reads/assignments so he could just turn loose his athleticism... In fact, after taking Anzalone, I thought we might be working our way back to a 3-4 with Cam slowing down, then we went and took Davenport with two ones and a fifth... Now, if we were playing old pass defense rules, I'd love to see Baun used in a 46, that'd be real exciting to see... But he just didn't seem as fluid in space as our LBers (e.g. Davis and Kwon) need to be in our nickel, heavy nickel, dime packages... |
It's not that my way is the right way, I just make the right way my way...
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
500th Post
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 576
|
Re: 2021 NFL Draft: New Orleans Saints
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
Agreed, a playmaker is a playmaker is a playmaker. I understand that logic. Kinda like if the Saints were to sign a speedy veteran WR to get past the secondary quick, fast and in a hurry, yet have a QB that either is unable to deliver a deep ball or is more often than not extremely hesitant to even try. The WR would still be a baller..., but not in the situation he would presently be in.![]()
Don’t we show 46 every now and then, but substituting an additional SS at the line, instead of a pure (J) LBer? It’s a 46 look though, right? lol, sometimes it worked, Jenkins had 2.5 sacks at that pos’n (effectively) last season. One more than either Rankins or Davenport. Sorry, couldn’t resist leaving you with Two 1sts on your mind on my way out. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|