|
|||||||
Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Over the cap says a post june 1 trade of peat would save us 1 million. Thats 1 million that can go to whatever free agent addition will play when peat gets hurt anyway. The Lions wanted Analzone, so I ...
9Likes |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-27-2021, 03:09 AM
|
#11 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,797
|
Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
Over the cap says a post june 1 trade of peat would save us 1 million. Thats 1 million that can go to whatever free agent addition will play when peat gets hurt anyway. The Lions wanted Analzone, so I could imagine they could want peat.
|
|
|
|
03-27-2021, 08:56 AM
|
#12 |
|
500th Post
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 576
|
Re: Lions Signed Analzone, Would They Want Peat?
Originally Posted by BakoSaint
It also shows a dead money cap hit of $4.6M, if that trade is made.
Dead cap we currently have is over $22.6M. 5th worse in the league..., but that’s without DB#9’s post 6/1 dead money hit which is an additional $12+M. Dead money reduces our current cap ceiling. You make that trade and we’ll be in the neighborhood of a $40M dead money cap reduction, post 6/1. For reference, that’s roughly 22% of our cap ceiling reduced, inclusive of that trade scenario. I’m just not a fan of reducing my cap by $4.6M to free up $1M immediately. |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
