|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by jnormand It's just his opinion. JW has to prove it. I'm not a believer in him right now either. The guy is an interception machine and doesn't seem very intelligent. Why would he not want him to ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,137
|
Re: Saints have a surprisingly low projected 2021 win total
Originally Posted by jnormand
I have no problem with doubting Winston. I doubt him too. But VD has gone way overboard in his criticism IMO. He’s exaggerated Winston’s turnovers, falsely claimed he was benched for Hill, makes hyperbolic statements about going undefeated and ignores any valid statistical observation about his performance when compared to other QBs. Doubting is one thing, blindly repeating “he sucks” with no other input is a personal grudge.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,819
|
Re: Saints have a surprisingly low projected 2021 win total
Originally Posted by Boston Saint
Ok his turnovers are easily looked up. 30 ints his last year starting. That’s all I need to know. And as him being benched for hill, what would you call it? He played like crap and hill replaced him
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,472
|
Re: Saints have a surprisingly low projected 2021 win total
Originally Posted by voodooido
You can't "bench" a QB that never started a game. Brees and Hill are the only two QB's that started a game for the Saints last season. Before the season Payton laid out the plan to start Hill if Brees was unable to go, but planned to bring in Winston if Brees got injured during a game. That is exactly how it played out.![]()
It made perfect sense. Hill practiced all week every week for his role as Joker. Winston took second team snaps. In a given week Winston was better prepared to take over mid-game based upon that week's game plan. On the other hand, Hill was much more entrenched into the full playbook and it made sense for him to be the starter if Brees was unable to go. As for Winston's 30 picks, it was double his average from previous seasons and came under Bruce Arians whose philosophy was to take chances downfield. |
“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,137
|
Re: Saints have a surprisingly low projected 2021 win total
If that’s “All you need to know” then that’s ignorant and short sided. Winston’s 30 Int season came with 33 TDs, 5000 yards and a 7-9 record. In 2005, Favre had 29 INTs (that’s only 1 less BTW) with only 20 TDS, less than 4,000 yards and a 4-12 record. Would your “all you need to know” attitude thrown in the towel on Favre?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,819
|
Re: Saints have a surprisingly low projected 2021 win total
Originally Posted by Boston Saint
And the next season Tom Brady won the super bowl with TB
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,472
|
Re: Saints have a surprisingly low projected 2021 win total
... after they abandoned Arians' offense and went with Brady's. Not to mention the fact that Brady may be the best QB to ever play the game. I'm no fan of Winston's either, but to say he's trash is simply incorrect. He could easily start for half the teams in the league.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 2,099
|
Re: Saints have a surprisingly low projected 2021 win total
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
This is true, but unfortunate we may in that 1/2 of the teams that may have to endure him starting. I will gladly admit I am wrong about being skeptical of Winston if he proves other wise. Hill or Winston, two mediocre options for the Saints. This has nothing to do with athletic ability, both have that.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,137
|
Re: Saints have a surprisingly low projected 2021 win total
This has nothing to do with the Favre Comparison question I put to you which you avoided. But, if you want to point out that Brady (by most measures the greatest QB ever) won a SB with a Tampa team that had improved WRs, RBs, OL and D as evidence that Winston is a “trash” QB, I will again call that an ignorant statement. Would you care to answer my question about why Winston’s terrible 30 Int season with a net +4 TDS was so much worse than Favres 29 with a -9? Or Elway’s -7? Or any of the other SB winning QBs I pointed out in previous threads that clearly had worse seasons (Brees first two years vs Winston’s for example) than ANY season Winston has had? No, you don’t. You are just going to pull out the “He Sucks” narrative and hope you are right.
|
You think you know, but you don’t know...and you never will! Coach Jim Mora
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,819
|
Re: Saints have a surprisingly low projected 2021 win total
Originally Posted by Boston Saint
If JW came to NO with the same credentials Farve has I would welcome him with open arms. Instead, he comes with a vet minimum 1yr deal because no one else wanted him. I don’t want him or Hill starting but I’d pick Hill over him all day. I want the Saints future to be drafted this year. Deep qb class will make someone fall to 28.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,137
|
Re: Saints have a surprisingly low projected 2021 win total
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|