|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; It would take multiple first rounds, Peat and TA. I would go as far to offer a hand job as well. We need him. When healthy he is by far the best in the league. 3 first rd picks would ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,846
|
Re: Aaron Rodgers ... Should we ?
It would take multiple first rounds, Peat and TA. I would go as far to offer a hand job as well. We need him. When healthy he is by far the best in the league. 3 first rd picks would definitely be worth it. Picking at 32 every year anyway.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,137
|
Re: Aaron Rodgers ... Should we ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Re: Aaron Rodgers ... Should we ?
| |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,065
|
Re: Aaron Rodgers ... Should we ?
No. Simply because I don’t think we have the supporting cast to get us to the SB right now and it would just get worse over the next three years because any draft capitol we would have had will likely belong to the Packers.
Brees couldn’t get it done in his prime when we didn’t have much talent on defense and he was better than Rodgers is at this point. Nothing makes me think we would get much better results now with Rodgers. I doubt Rodgers would even want to come here for the same reasons. We aren’t the team that’s a QB away from winning the Super Bowl. Who knows lighting could strike twice and we COULD hit gold in a couple of our UDFA and draft picks but I doubt it. |
"Where life had no value, death, sometimes, had its price. That is why the bounty killers appeared."
|
|
![]() |
![]() |