Evidence of officiating bias against the Saints? - Triplett

SmashMouth · 01-20-2022, 10:14 PM

YouTube (Short URL)

saintfan · 01-21-2022, 12:08 PM

Its interesting to see what we've all been seeing (well, everybody cept speedo) finally show in the numbers. Hardly a one-off at this point. I mean it warrants an explanation and frankly action. The bias is now clear and cannot be argued.

And Sean's comments when he left the competition committee tell the tale.

How will Roger address this? The short answer is he won't. He will do some things to satisfy the media and fanboys like speedo, but his vendetta against Sean will remain. His need to control games will remain. There's too much money at stake to allow fair play to be the priority.

K Major · 01-21-2022, 02:19 PM

Originally Posted by SmashMouth

https://youtu.be/HwDb7dTTGfo

At the tail of that piece they spoke about the Saints “possibly” selecting Pickett (QB) @ #18 😞. I hope the National scouts have done serious homework here.

We all saw the game changing qualifiers Mahommes, Burrow and Hebert had in college. I just don’t see it from the kid @ Pitt.

Huge gamble to take a QB that high.

I’d much rather go with WR in the first rd, but hey that’s just me.

Boston Saint · 01-21-2022, 02:22 PM

Originally Posted by K Major

At the tail of that piece they spoke about the Saints “possibly” selecting Pickett (QB) @ #18 😞. I hope the National scouts have done serious homework here.

We all saw the game changing qualifiers Mahommes, Burrow and Hebert had in college. I just don’t see it from the kid @ Pitt.

Huge gamble to take a QB that high.

I’d much rather go with WR in the first rd, but hey that’s just me.

I think it just gives them something to write about. QB is the “sexiest” position on a team to draft.

SaintGnome · 01-21-2022, 03:07 PM

Originally Posted by K Major

At the tail of that piece they spoke about the Saints “possibly” selecting Pickett (QB) @ #18 😞. I hope the National scouts have done serious homework here.

We all saw the game changing qualifiers Mahommes, Burrow and Hebert had in college. I just don’t see it from the kid @ Pitt.

Huge gamble to take a QB that high.

I’d much rather go with WR in the first rd, but hey that’s just me.

Are we really writing Book off on that one start where he was running for his life the entire game when we had 20 starters out on Covid? Did he even practice with the first string that week?

saintfan · 01-21-2022, 03:38 PM

Originally Posted by SaintGnome

Are we really writing Book off on that one start where he was running for his life the entire game when we had 20 starters out on Covid? Did he even practice with the first string that week?

I want to see the kid get a real shot with some playmakers around him. Then again I feel the same way about Hill and Winston.

Do over. Reset. Clean slate. This year was a wash.

MatthewT · 01-21-2022, 03:47 PM

I am not sold on Pickett either. My hopes is a great offensive lineman is available and taken by the Saints at 18. Right now the Saints could get by in the short term with Hill, and would not completely ignore Bortles if additional free agent help isn't available. I think Book needs another year on the bench before we know if he warrants consideration as a long term solution or not.

AsylumGuido · 01-21-2022, 06:15 PM

Now here's some bias.

Rugby Saint II likes this.

jeanpierre · 01-21-2022, 09:26 PM

Raymond is gonna get a steak dinner from Sean for this one...

Vrillon82 · 01-21-2022, 11:19 PM

Some people can be Bengal fans, but these stats is something ive kept an eye on for years, especially since the no call. One consistent stat that has stood out is the Bengals always being top 5 in penalties called against their opponent.

So the Titans or anyone for that matter better watch out if they keep that game close.

01-21-2022, 12:08 PM	#2
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Evidence of officiating bias against the Saints? - Triplett Its interesting to see what we've all been seeing (well, everybody cept speedo) finally show in the numbers. Hardly a one-off at this point. I mean it warrants an explanation and frankly action. The bias is now clear and cannot be argued. And Sean's comments when he left the competition committee tell the tale. How will Roger address this? The short answer is he won't. He will do some things to satisfy the media and fanboys like speedo, but his vendetta against Sean will remain. His need to control games will remain. There's too much money at stake to allow fair play to be the priority. jeanpierre, K Major and Boston Saint like this.
	C'mon Man...

01-21-2022, 02:19 PM	#3
K Major Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Bedford, TX Posts: 24,063 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Evidence of officiating bias against the Saints? - Triplett Originally Posted by SmashMouth https://youtu.be/HwDb7dTTGfo At the tail of that piece they spoke about the Saints “possibly” selecting Pickett (QB) @ #18 😞. I hope the National scouts have done serious homework here. We all saw the game changing qualifiers Mahommes, Burrow and Hebert had in college. I just don’t see it from the kid @ Pitt. Huge gamble to take a QB that high. I’d much rather go with WR in the first rd, but hey that’s just me. SmashMouth likes this.

01-21-2022, 02:22 PM	#4
Boston Saint 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2020 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 4,877	Re: Evidence of officiating bias against the Saints? - Triplett Originally Posted by K Major At the tail of that piece they spoke about the Saints “possibly” selecting Pickett (QB) @ #18 😞. I hope the National scouts have done serious homework here. We all saw the game changing qualifiers Mahommes, Burrow and Hebert had in college. I just don’t see it from the kid @ Pitt. Huge gamble to take a QB that high. I’d much rather go with WR in the first rd, but hey that’s just me. I think it just gives them something to write about. QB is the “sexiest” position on a team to draft.

01-21-2022, 03:07 PM	#5
SaintGnome 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2017 Location: Bradenton,FL Posts: 642	Re: Evidence of officiating bias against the Saints? - Triplett Originally Posted by K Major At the tail of that piece they spoke about the Saints “possibly” selecting Pickett (QB) @ #18 😞. I hope the National scouts have done serious homework here. We all saw the game changing qualifiers Mahommes, Burrow and Hebert had in college. I just don’t see it from the kid @ Pitt. Huge gamble to take a QB that high. I’d much rather go with WR in the first rd, but hey that’s just me. Are we really writing Book off on that one start where he was running for his life the entire game when we had 20 starters out on Covid? Did he even practice with the first string that week? saintfan, jnormand, SmashMouth and 1 others like this.

01-21-2022, 03:38 PM	#6
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Evidence of officiating bias against the Saints? - Triplett Originally Posted by SaintGnome Are we really writing Book off on that one start where he was running for his life the entire game when we had 20 starters out on Covid? Did he even practice with the first string that week? I want to see the kid get a real shot with some playmakers around him. Then again I feel the same way about Hill and Winston. Do over. Reset. Clean slate. This year was a wash. SmashMouth and SaintGnome like this.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-21-2022, 03:47 PM	#7
MatthewT 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Mississippi Posts: 2,706	Re: Evidence of officiating bias against the Saints? - Triplett I am not sold on Pickett either. My hopes is a great offensive lineman is available and taken by the Saints at 18. Right now the Saints could get by in the short term with Hill, and would not completely ignore Bortles if additional free agent help isn't available. I think Book needs another year on the bench before we know if he warrants consideration as a long term solution or not.

01-21-2022, 06:15 PM	#8
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 24,395	Re: Evidence of officiating bias against the Saints? - Triplett Now here's some bias. Twitter Rugby Saint II likes this.

01-21-2022, 09:26 PM	#9
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: Evidence of officiating bias against the Saints? - Triplett Raymond is gonna get a steak dinner from Sean for this one... saintfan and K Major like this.

01-21-2022, 11:19 PM	#10
Vrillon82 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,127	Re: Evidence of officiating bias against the Saints? - Triplett Some people can be Bengal fans, but these stats is something ive kept an eye on for years, especially since the no call. One consistent stat that has stood out is the Bengals always being top 5 in penalties called against their opponent. So the Titans or anyone for that matter better watch out if they keep that game close.
Vrillon82 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,127