|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; A heavy dose of Taysom, Ingram & possibly Murray on Sunday. Saints need to "air it out" anyway. Winston has a gun & receivers who can go get it. The NFL is a grind. ICE UP AK !...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Site Donor 2019
|
Re: Injury Report: Game 2 Tampa Bay
A heavy dose of Taysom, Ingram & possibly Murray on Sunday.
Saints need to "air it out" anyway. Winston has a gun & receivers who can go get it. The NFL is a grind. ICE UP AK ! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,137
|
Re: Injury Report: Game 2 Tampa Bay
Air it out Indeed! Landry, Olave, and, yes Thomas all seem to be in good shape. Add in Johnson and the WR/TE corps should get a lot of passes. However they OL needs to scheme or get help, ball should be in the air IMO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: Injury Report: Game 2 Tampa Bay
Friday report is out!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: Injury Report: Game 2 Tampa Bay
At least no one is listed as doubtful so there is a chance of everyone but Adebo playing. Sounds like Kamara may being somewhere between doubtful and questionable. No way Winston doesn't play.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: Injury Report: Game 2 Tampa Bay
As a reminder. I know most already are aware of this, but some may not be.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Resident Swede
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Märsta, Sweden
Posts: 8,045
|
Re: Injury Report: Game 2 Tampa Bay
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
I didn't know that. Then it doesnt seem as bleak.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: Injury Report: Game 2 Tampa Bay
Yeah. They made the change back in 2016.
NFL drops “probable” from injury report, redefines “questionable” and “doubtful” Posted by Mike Florio on August 21, 2016, 2:40 PM EDT It’s definite that “probable” no longer will be part of the NFL injury lexicon. As first noted (as best we can tell) by Armando Salguero of the Miami Herald and as the league office confirms, the widely-misconstrued P-word has been dumped from the injury reporting procedures. “The ‘Probable’ category was eliminated from the Game Status Report because approximately 95 percent of the players who were listed as ‘Probable’ in prior years did in fact play in the game,” the league explained. There was a reason for that high percentage of participation. Although many believed that “probable” suggested a 75-percent likelihood of playing, it actually meant that the player was virtually certain to be available for normal duty. After the Falcons scratched quarterback Mike Vick, who had been listed as probable with a knee injury, from a 2005 game against New England, the league reminded teams of the true meaning of “probable,” and it began routinely investigating situations in which a player listed as “probable” did not actually play. The NFL also has changed the meaning of “questionable” and “doubtful”; previously, the “questionable” category reflected a 50-50 likelihood of playing, and “doubtful” meant a 75-percent chance the player wouldn’t play. Now, “questionable” simply means that “it is uncertain as to whether the player will play in the game,” and “doubtful” means that “it is unlikely the player will participate.” ____________________________ It has evolved into anyone not listed as "full participation" gets a "questionable" tag now and even some of them. |
“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill
|
|
![]() |
![]() |