|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II [B] I agree. But, we do need an Alpha somewhere! At Head Coach, it would make a big difference for us right about now....
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-18-2023, 03:55 PM | #11 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,875
|
Re: Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
12-19-2023, 04:40 PM | #12 |
Bounty Money $$$
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,052
|
Re: Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?
|
12-21-2023, 06:27 AM | #13 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,026
|
Re: Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?
Leadership isn’t about being an ‘alpha’. Alphas command, leaders inspire. There are some similar qualities between the two but a Chet (Weird Science) is not going to inspire players. Your typical alpha commands within a singular dimension where as leadership characteristics require range and depth to inspire individual personalities.
The alpha has a lowest common denominator approach, the leader uses individual strengths and helps people overcome their individual weaknesses. Keep in mind that the ‘alpha’ personality is already on the field many times over. I might be inclined to argue that we have too many alphas and no leadership off the field because alphas only respond to leadership. |
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau
|
|
12-21-2023, 10:36 AM | #14 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?
Originally Posted by TheOak
I am one that wanted an alpha coach because I watched it with Payton for so long. It's certainly not the only characteristic that a coach needs to lead nor is it even a necessity. As you say, the Saints have many alphas on this team in Thomas, Kamara, DeMario, Cam, Mathieu and even arguably Carr. It seems to me that Dennis Allen has the intelligence to put together a good defense but he doesn't exude a commanding presence that the guys I mentioned would run through a wall for.
I should say that the Saints need a leader at HC. A leader is needed for sure. Alpha or not. |
"...it's good to have friends, no matter where they are."--JOESAM2002
|
|
12-22-2023, 01:28 PM | #15 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,026
|
Re: Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?
Originally Posted by iceshack149
I get it. The difference is that we see Alpha a little differently. I see Sean Payton as terse, introverted, and somewhat enigmatic; like a Tom Landry, or Bill Belichick. When I think Alpha it’s along the lines of Lawrence Taylor, Mike Tomlin, Dan Campbell, Lyle Alzedo, etc… and I don’t see Sean Payton fitting into that list very well.
Now if I contrast Sean to mealy mouth Dennis he is certainly closer to an Alpha personality. |
12-22-2023, 01:43 PM | #16 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,875
|
Re: Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?
Originally Posted by TheOak
It’s a matter of PRESENCE. As a Player, Belichick just walking into the room, or even Sean Mcvay walking into the room, has a completely different effect energetically, than the gnat that we currently have.
|