Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?

neugey · 12-16-2023, 05:24 PM

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II

Who would be a good GM? Ireland already failed at that once and we need to get away from nepotism in a bad way. Mickey isn't an Alpha. DA isn't an Alpha. PC certainly isn't an Alpha! We badly need an Alpha male somewhere in this dysfunctional organization.

I don't think we necessarily need "alpha's" in all positions. We may just need very bright people who have enough leadership sense to make it work. Mike McDaniel in Miami or the late Mike Leach command respect because of their bold genius. Think of a guy like Gary Kubiak when he was in Denver - not alpha material but a guy with great football smarts who ran things well. Or the great Tom Osborne ... hardly gave off alpha vibes but my god people ran through walls for him because they trusted his approach and resolve.

12-16-2023, 05:24 PM	#7
neugey Hu Dat! Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 6,820 Blog Entries: 13	Re: Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme? Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II Who would be a good GM? Ireland already failed at that once and we need to get away from nepotism in a bad way. Mickey isn't an Alpha. DA isn't an Alpha. PC certainly isn't an Alpha! We badly need an Alpha male somewhere in this dysfunctional organization. I don't think we necessarily need "alpha's" in all positions. We may just need very bright people who have enough leadership sense to make it work. Mike McDaniel in Miami or the late Mike Leach command respect because of their bold genius. Think of a guy like Gary Kubiak when he was in Denver - not alpha material but a guy with great football smarts who ran things well. Or the great Tom Osborne ... hardly gave off alpha vibes but my god people ran through walls for him because they trusted his approach and resolve.