Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by neugey I don't think we necessarily need "alpha's" in all positions. Originally Posted by neugey We may just need very bright people who have enough leadership sense to make it work. Mike McDaniel in Miami or the ...

Like Tree18Likes

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-18-2023, 02:43 PM   #9
Bounty Money $$$
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,167
Re: Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?

Originally Posted by neugey View Post
I don't think we necessarily need "alpha's" in all positions.
Originally Posted by neugey View Post
We may just need very bright people who have enough leadership sense to make it work. Mike McDaniel in Miami or the late Mike Leach command respect because of their bold genius. Think of a guy like Gary Kubiak when he was in Denver - not alpha material but a guy with great football smarts who ran things well. Or the great Tom Osborne ... hardly gave off alpha vibes but my god people ran through walls for him because they trusted his approach and resolve.
I agree. But, we do need an Alpha somewhere!
SmashMouth and Sinner like this.
Rugby Saint II is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts