Speaking of negativity ... I definitely see Carr as better than Russell Wilson, as well.

https://twitter.com/RosvoglouReport/...99349598425482

If the options are:

A. Derek Carr

B. Russell Wilson

C. DeShaun Watson

Then much like Hepatitis, I would rather have A than B or C.

But to use this analogy I had to look up which Hepatitis is the least bad, and I would really rather have none of the above.

Unfortunately while Hepatitis A is the most transmissible according to my google search, Carr's contract makes him untradable unless we kick in a 1st round pick.

It is what it is with Carr. His contract is guaranteed so we have to see what we have. But I am not impressed with a season where he boosted his numbers against weak competition and the best opposing QBs he could beat were Mayfield, Tannehill, Minshew, and Young. But I think we need to approach the 2025 salary cap with the goal of having an offramp after Year 2 of the contract, just like the Broncos did with Wilson, and like the Browns wish they could with Watson.

Carr was never signed as a stop gap. He was signed as our QB for the foreseeable future. Why is there even a consideration of a trade? Thank God you aren't anywhere close to making our decisions.

Because Derek Carr is mediocre and everyone in the world but you and our front office know it. While slightly better than present day Russell Wilson, he is absolutely being compared to him for a reason, and even you brought up the comparison because at some level you know its valid.

You can want Derek Carr to be a long term solution. The Saints can sign him as one. But that probably won't make him one, unless what you want long term is mediocrity. I continue to believe that Drew Bledsoe's tenure with the Bill is a reasonable comp.

Believe whatever you want in your cyber world. There is nothing that will ever satisfy you as long as your personal obsession Loomis is in charge. That, my friend, is called a personal problem.

If Loomis completely changed virtually all of the philosophies that have dictated his decisions for the past decade or so that would also satisfy me. Occasionally I see glimmers of hope, like when you posted that Cam Jordan's restructure was much smaller than expected, which turned out to be a typo and you were equally supportive of the decision when it turned out to be another max restructure.

It's nothing personal with me and Loomis. I just disagree with 95% of his decisions and don't enjoy what I see as my team being led in absolutely the wrong direction, squandering the finals years of Brees career, driving away Sean Payton, and settling into mediocrity without Brees and Payton while assembling the oldest team in the league with the least cap space, youth, and draft picks to have upside to improve. Imagine if you had very clear thoughts on what decisions you thought the Saints should make and they did the opposite 95% of the time. I imagine you might express displeasure with the person making those decisions, if you had any independent mind of your own.