Official 2024 Saints OTA News and Discussion

Boston Saint · 05-25-2024, 07:43 PM

Originally Posted by Sinner

Not triggered at all. Just to be clear, I’m sure you’d like us to be in a position to draft better, and since you used San Fran as an example, we would have to theoretically extend or increase the intensity of our suckiness to achieve that goal. OR we could suck at our current level, and remain at our current draft level, while retaining our substitute Head Coach… Which would you prefer?

Again, reading comprehension. To quote you….

“I’m sure you’d like us to be in a position to draft better, and since you used San Fran as an example,”

First all you are surety is full of crap because I do not want, nor have ever said, I want them in a better draft position. I clearly said in the other thread (the one I started in which you passive aggressively responded but did not answer the question posed) that I want them to win the NFCS. That clearly is not wanting better draft positioning.

Secondly, I wasn’t bringing up San Fran as an example for ANYTHING. I made a factual comment in a discussion going on about Purdy, Haener, the recent Niner success and their perceived commitment to winning. I (again 100 percent accurately) noted that the Niners had a fairly recent losing period (especially compared to the Saints) that aided their success. I also (again factually) pointed out that the Saints have performed “well” enough that they did not build that type of draft capital.

You directly respond to me in a smart-ass manner falsely claiming I was endorsing a tanking plan of some type. That’s textbook being triggered. You know you can set me to ignore if my posts bother you so much.

05-25-2024, 07:43 PM	#11
Boston Saint 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Nov 2020 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 5,137	Re: Official 2024 Saints OTA News and Discussion Originally Posted by Sinner Not triggered at all. Just to be clear, I’m sure you’d like us to be in a position to draft better, and since you used San Fran as an example, we would have to theoretically extend or increase the intensity of our suckiness to achieve that goal. OR we could suck at our current level, and remain at our current draft level, while retaining our substitute Head Coach… Which would you prefer? Again, reading comprehension. To quote you…. “I’m sure you’d like us to be in a position to draft better, and since you used San Fran as an example,” First all you are surety is full of crap because I do not want, nor have ever said, I want them in a better draft position. I clearly said in the other thread (the one I started in which you passive aggressively responded but did not answer the question posed) that I want them to win the NFCS. That clearly is not wanting better draft positioning. Secondly, I wasn’t bringing up San Fran as an example for ANYTHING. I made a factual comment in a discussion going on about Purdy, Haener, the recent Niner success and their perceived commitment to winning. I (again 100 percent accurately) noted that the Niners had a fairly recent losing period (especially compared to the Saints) that aided their success. I also (again factually) pointed out that the Saints have performed “well” enough that they did not build that type of draft capital. You directly respond to me in a smart-ass manner falsely claiming I was endorsing a tanking plan of some type. That’s textbook being triggered. You know you can set me to ignore if my posts bother you so much.
	You think you know, but you don’t know...and you never will! Coach Jim Mora