..but Carr is cuter.. I like white boys better...

RE: Take a Flyer on Carr
 

It can be said that Carr is under pressure more than brooks is, seeing as he is sacked more times than any one in recent history, however, Carr has less interceptions. Carr also has a better completion percentage. Carr has less yds but more touchdowns.

now. all im saying is that if we contend that Carr and Brooks hold on to the ball too long and play behind below average lines why wouldnt we want the one who plays better despite being hit more often?
we all know that stats can be perceived differently. but one quaterback throws more td then ints and completes more passes. i dont think those can mean anything but that.

jbutts that's logic. The threadstarter doesn't know what that is. Anyway, why couldn't this be in the thread that's already about David Carr?

... but Carr is cuter.... I like white boys better..

..it also means that the coaching staff is not afraid to recognize a mistake after 3 years of seeing an athletic player not be effective playing QB, unlike certain coaching staff whose name shall remain unspoken...

..and it's clique, not click... click is what you do with the mouse button...

Whodi, dooode!!! U da man!!! The bossman, the leader of the pack, the big kahuna, the big cheese, numero uno, V.I.P...

...can I still call you Whodi?

There you go again. AB carries the team by getting us 3 points against green bay? I'd love to have carr over AB. At least he can hit his receivers in stride and complete a screen pass, and isn't afraid to us his legs. And who has the most interceptions and who has the most TD passes again? yeah i'll join the clique on this one. You can be the weird kid in the library handling the A/V equipment.

Even the "weird" kids know that something is wrong with Aaron Brooks' play at quarterback. Frankly, I'm suprised that someone still tries to defend his horrible play. No one that I know in person defends Brooks. No one.

Look who you are talking to TR.

Why sure Tr. Sure. I won't let it go to my head. I promise. :D

... I'll call you "Generalisimo" from now on...

I will more than likley get a "why did you butt in response" but here I go anyway,

BoB, you always, always defend Brooks. At least that is the way the rest of "Us" interpret it. If that is not what you are doing you need to be a little more clear on what the heck the point you are tring to get across is. The Thread did start out as an AB defense.

You are darn right he won't, I have not made this opinion about AB just recently. I have HAD this opinion about him for five years now. As so has many other people here. This is not and will not be a "bandwagon BROOKS SUCKS" one week then "BROOKS IS THE SAVIOR OF THE SAINTS" next week. Face it dude, this guy is gone.

Just out of nosiness, who do you want as our QB, If we had a decent O-line?