![]() |
Does anyone remember who...
...it was that was saying that Smith wasn't the #1 receiver in Carolina, while Muhammad was there? I think it was during the preseason, tried to do a search, but it's not working. :(
|
RE: Does anyone remember who...
That is a Billyesque point .
Try Gambler . |
Trust me, that was Billy. I know, cause I had the argument with him when I was laying out all the people who got hurt for Carolina, and Jake still having a better year than AB. When I said Smith, he said Smith was not a number one anyway, Muhammed was. I laughed then, and I am laughing even harder now.
|
BlackonBlack = Billy
Gotta be |
One day you truly will stop embarrassing yourself, and actually say something that is correct, and shock us all.
2003: Steve Smith - 88 catches 1100 yards 7 TDs 2003: Muhsin Muhammed - 54 catches 837 yards 3 TDs. Who was the number one again? Please stop embarrassing yourself in EVERY thread. And lynwood, I think you are right. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just to make yourself look even sillier, go look at Muhammed's numbers from 2002 also. He wasn't even a number one receiver then. He has only had one or two good years, and that was like 3-5 years ago. Your lack of knowledge is just getting apalling. |
Quote:
|
Many NFL teams pick their "speed" guy to run back kicks. The "speed" guys are not typically the #1 receiver. I doubt Horn is quicker than Stallworth. Michael Lewis had his job because of his speed.
|
I remember being a big part of that thread... I believe we pulled up a crap load of stats proving Smith was the number one receiver there. I can't remember who was debating against us though. Before Muhammad had that big year last season... the previous 2 or 3 seasons Smith had better numbers than Muhammad. That case was closed during the offseason... :wink:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com