|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Those who know me, know that I'm not a stats guy, but I came across this nugget while answering another post, and I feel it's worth it of its own thread. Check this out: Points scored by the 2005 Saints ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-27-2005, 12:43 PM | #1 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Saints would still lose if defense was the 2000 Ravens
Those who know me, know that I'm not a stats guy, but I came across this nugget while answering another post, and I feel it's worth it of its own thread.
Check this out: Points scored by the 2005 Saints offense: 15.9 per game Points allowed by the 2000 Ravens defense: 16.5 per game So, even if the Saints defense was the equivalent of the 2000 Ravens defense, they'd still lose by the totally inept play of the offense!!! The 2005 Saints defense would have to be the equivalent of the 1985 Bears defense, which allowed less than 13 points per game, for the Saints to actually win games. Discuss... |
'Cause the simple man pays the thrills, the bills and the pills that kill
|
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
11-27-2005, 01:03 PM | #2 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hockley, Tx
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: RE: Saints would still lose if defense was the 2000 Rav
Originally Posted by BlackonBlack
Just proves truly how inept our offense is. Funny that you are finally shown that if our defense was the 2000 ravens that you start to bash the offense including the QB. Is this the start of your seeing the light?
|
11-27-2005, 01:38 PM | #3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hockley, Tx
Posts: 1,515
|
RE: Re: RE: Saints would still lose if defense was the 2000
Hey you put yourself there. You've been carring the Defense sucks banner the offense isn't at fault flag since you started posting here. So don't say i'm putting you anywhere. You may not be in the boat but it sounds as if you are trailing in the dingy not far behind. All it will take is for brooks to move on to another team and show the same handicaps he has here and you'll be asking for a "click" t-shirt.
|
11-27-2005, 01:54 PM | #4 |
Sammich Lover
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 682
|
Actually the 2000 Raven defense held opponents to precisely 10.3125 points per game during the regular season.
http://www.football.com/nfl/records/NFLDScoring.shtml Just look under Fewest Points Allowed, Season (16-game Seasons) 165 divided by 16 is 10.3125. That still doesn’t change the fact that our offense is dog poop, and that our QB, LT, and LG should be replaced. |
11-27-2005, 04:54 PM | #5 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Originally Posted by wheelman
Out of curiousity, do you know how is that tabulated? There's a 6 point-per-game discrepancy between tthe number in that site and the number you get when you add all of the final scores for all 16 games the Ravens played in. I know that some of the scores against the Ravens may have come from turnovers by the offense/special teams and did not involve the defense, but 96 points?? That's a lot; I doubt that 96 points were scored against the Ravens after turnovers by the offense/special teams
... Now, it may be that that tabulation doesn't count field goals and special teams scores as scores against the defense...then I would need to take all field goals out of the average for the 2005 Saints offense and any scores by special teams or the defense. |
'Cause the simple man pays the thrills, the bills and the pills that kill
|
|
11-27-2005, 04:55 PM | #6 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Re: RE: Saints would still lose if defense was the 2000 Rav
Originally Posted by BlackonBlack
..well, when I consider "other aspects", as in my "defense has actually played well" post, you dismiss them. So, which one is it? Stats or "other aspects"??? |
'Cause the simple man pays the thrills, the bills and the pills that kill
|
|
11-27-2005, 05:58 PM | #7 |
Sammich Lover
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 682
|
http://www.baltimoreravens.com/docs/FINALStats_2000.pdf Or follow this link; http://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/schedule.jsp then click on 2000 Season Results at the bottom if the other link won't work. But, as I said, it's still no excuse for our bad play on offense. |
11-27-2005, 06:11 PM | #8 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Originally Posted by wheelman
You are absolutely right.
I know what I did wrong... I stand corrected, then... If the 2005 Saints defense were the 2000 Ravens defense, teh Saints would be unbeaten |
'Cause the simple man pays the thrills, the bills and the pills that kill
|
|
11-27-2005, 06:25 PM | #9 |
Sammich Lover
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 682
|
|
|
|