|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; with all these LBs declaring... i actually think we need to trade down and try to acquire another high 2nd round pick and pick 2 LBs with both of them A man with vision, a Pakman if you will. Damn, ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-09-2006, 06:44 PM | #51 |
Fan Since 1967
|
I don't think I can explain that any better and we are not talking about the future. The Saints have to win now because if we don't THERE WON'T BE A FUTURE. Is anyone reading this the same way I am writing it. The seats will be full next year no matter who the QB is!!!!!!! |
Golf and sex are about the only things you can enjoy without being good at them.
Jimmy Demaret |
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
01-09-2006, 06:49 PM | #52 |
100th Post
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 305
|
RE: Defense !!1
GO DDDDDDDDDDDDD
|
01-09-2006, 07:34 PM | #53 |
500th Post
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Abingdon, Virginia
Posts: 522
|
Ok, heres my opinion, if I have said something different, sorry, but this is it now.
Trade down, pick up 2nd and draft Hawk (MLB over) First second rounder- Max Gean Gilles Second Second Rounder- BA DT or OLB Also, two players I have noticed, and have wondered about. Ahmad Brooks and AJ Nicholson, how late do you think each will fall? Should we get them? TheDeuce Posted: Jan 09, 2006 - 10:02 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote: My problem with Leinart is that he is either going to be good or going to be a total bust. I'd rather trade down and take the best defensive player in this class and pick up a quality QB in round 2 or even manage a later round 1. OK so you'd trade the 2nd best offensive player for the best defensive player because you're afraid Leinart could be a bust? What stops AJ Hawk from being a bust? NOthing, and you know it. He has more injury concerns that Leinart. Also, adding a "quality" QB isn't the same as adding a stud QB. Like I said earlier, just having a bunch of mediocre QBs doesn't mean the quarterback position will be good. It means they'll be mediocre. Look at the COlts. THey have Peyton and then.... Jim Sorgi. You don't need an Omar Jacobs, AMAC and a washed up veteran, you need a franchise QB, which is exactly what Leinart is. Ok, but I have a question. Which would you rather have, a stud QB or a stud MLB? A person to man the offense, or to man the defense? If Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson can lead teams to Super Bowls, why can't we rent a QB and have them play decent for a respectable record? |
01-09-2006, 08:04 PM | #55 |
100th Post
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 332
|
gino toretta=matt lienart. |
01-09-2006, 08:22 PM | #56 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
winwin=blackonblack. So, always wrong.
|
01-10-2006, 06:45 AM | #57 |
The Dark Overlord
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,450
|
where they hell do u guys get those at? and arent these a lil old?
|
01-10-2006, 06:47 AM | #58 |
The Dark Overlord
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,450
|
im talkin about the scouting reports on the qbs....
|
01-10-2006, 08:36 AM | #59 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belleview, FL
Posts: 526
|
the saints need to put butts in the seats next year and go 8-8. if they don't do both start printing new jerseys with the los angeles saints on it.
defense is important to win, but some forget that we actually had a decent defense this year. considering we had the worst turnover margin in the league this year and still had a defense ranked 14th overall says to me that a good defensive coordinator(get rid of venturi)a qb with a brain(leinhart) and a healthy deuce would make the saints a heads on favorite for 2006's worst to first team. look what pitsburgh did with rothesburger(how ever spell his name) his rookie year. solid defense with a heavy dose of the running game. i agree with charmy and others that we need to pick up a solid young lb in the draft, but i think there will be plenty available when we pick early in the 2nd round. |
01-10-2006, 08:50 AM | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 726
|
I know this is slightly off-topic, but BMG, have you given any consideration to a new name, if the team puts us out of our misery and actually does let Brooks go? How about BrooksIsDone?
|