Kiper's Big Board

BlackandBlue · 01-09-2006, 03:38 PM

Sometimes players slide, papz, take comfort in that, especially when you are sitting at the top of the 2nd round.

TheDeuce · 01-09-2006, 03:56 PM

Tons of LB depth in this draft. No need to give away our QB savior for a LB. This isn't like 2 years ago when there were only two good LBs and they both got drafted before us. DOn't worry, there will be some total STUDS left at #34.

Milians · 01-09-2006, 04:59 PM

You are right, the draft is loaded at LB. Sims(FSU) and Parham(Virginia) declared today. Someone is bound to slip to our pick in the second round. Gotta go QB with our first pick.

Tobias-Reiper · 01-09-2006, 05:20 PM

Originally Posted by BlackandBlue

You do know Pak is a moderator, right?

He is deserving of your respect, not one word sarcastic replies.

How about sarcastic phrases?

I really think the Saints should pick up Hawk.

Crusader · 01-09-2006, 05:29 PM

5. Daniel Bullocks, Nebraska

Its not a big need at the moment but it sure would be sweet to have both Bullocks brothers in the d-backfield.

CheramieIII · 01-09-2006, 07:37 PM

I still say trade down 2 get Hawk pick up some more picks and a veteran QB at the same time.

BlackandBlue · 01-09-2006, 07:47 PM

How about sarcastic phrases?

Good point, bad day.

I apologize for the misunderstanding, Mordor, if that is what it was.

MordorIV · 01-09-2006, 07:48 PM

Go hawk

01-09-2006, 03:56 PM	#12
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928	Tons of LB depth in this draft. No need to give away our QB savior for a LB. This isn't like 2 years ago when there were only two good LBs and they both got drafted before us. DOn't worry, there will be some total STUDS left at #34.
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928

01-09-2006, 04:59 PM	#13
Milians Registered Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 81	You are right, the draft is loaded at LB. Sims(FSU) and Parham(Virginia) declared today. Someone is bound to slip to our pick in the second round. Gotta go QB with our first pick.
Milians Registered Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 81

01-09-2006, 05:20 PM	#14
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: RE: Kiper Originally Posted by BlackandBlue You do know Pak is a moderator, right? He is deserving of your respect, not one word sarcastic replies. How about sarcastic phrases? I really think the Saints should pick up Hawk.

01-09-2006, 05:29 PM	#15
Crusader Resident Swede Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Märsta, Sweden Posts: 8,025	RE: Re: RE: Kiper 5. Daniel Bullocks, Nebraska Its not a big need at the moment but it sure would be sweet to have both Bullocks brothers in the d-backfield.

01-09-2006, 07:37 PM	#16
CheramieIII Fan Since 1967 Join Date: May 2004 Location: Nomad Posts: 7,487 Blog Entries: 3	RE: Re: RE: Kiper I still say trade down 2 get Hawk pick up some more picks and a veteran QB at the same time.

01-09-2006, 03:38 PM	#11
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	Sometimes players slide, papz, take comfort in that, especially when you are sitting at the top of the 2nd round.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-09-2006, 07:47 PM	#17
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	RE: Re: RE: Kiper How about sarcastic phrases? Good point, bad day. I apologize for the misunderstanding, Mordor, if that is what it was.

01-09-2006, 07:48 PM	#18
MordorIV 100th Post Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Colorado Posts: 305	RE: Re: RE: Kiper Go hawk