question?

ssmitty · 03-14-2006, 07:28 AM

does someone know number wise how the 22nd, 29th, and 61st, would add up to the 2nd pick?..................smitty

LKelley67 · 03-14-2006, 08:03 AM

they do not add up to it. #2 is 2600pts, those add up to 1712pts. throw in #18 and it would be equal. someone proposing a denver trade?

here's a link to a value chart to keep handy this time of year-
http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/6330687

if getting brees, i like trading down to #4 the jets spot and get #35 and #71 in return (close value). that would then be #4, 34, 35, and 71- d'brick, a top 6 LB (or 2), another starter, and a replacement for our missing 3rd rounder.

one more handy link-
http://www.draftboardinsider.com/res...raftorder.html

ssmitty · 03-15-2006, 07:29 AM

thanks for the link kelly........
now, the vikings are looking for a qb..............
how about the 17th, 48th, 51st, and next yrs 1st? or 2nd and 3rd? smitty

LKelley67 · 03-15-2006, 08:46 AM

LOL, do the math schmitskins...
#2= 2600pts

17+48+51= 1760 that is 840pts shy. picks for the next season are generally scored as one round lower. an average first rounder would= less than 500pts. the roll of the dice with a next years pick is a surprising finish. last winter if trading for the bears first rounder you might have expected to get #10 to #16 on the high end, probably lower. oops, surprise to #26. the opposite with the jets. most would have thought maybe a mid first round pick at best. viola you get #4.

trading out of the top costs a lot! the eli trade was about right. to move up 3 spots (essentially) the giants had to give the #3 that year plus the #1 and #5 the next. the high cost is what makes swapping with TN or NYJ most viable. the saints would probably be satisfied with a #2 and #3 this year or a #3 and next years #1. that is unless a bidding war ensues. i like the prospects of that! hermdingerdog, leinarts former OC is at TN and the Jets would have to love having a marquee golden boy to hand the reins to.

to drop lower than the top 6-7 would require at least two first rounders and/or an established starter probably.

LKelley67 · 03-15-2006, 09:19 AM

from twincities.com smitty?

However, some people think the Vikings might be able to take the No. 51 pick from Miami, their own No. 17 and No. 48 overall picks, plus trade a player or two (perhaps Jim Kleinsasser and/or Nate Burleson), to New Orleans for the Saints' No. 2 overall pick.

http://www.twincities.com/mld/twinci...s/14100229.htm

e.j. henderson and bennet and the picks is my counter offer

ssmitty · 03-15-2006, 04:51 PM

Originally Posted by LKelley67

from twincities.com smitty?

However, some people think the Vikings might be able to take the No. 51 pick from Miami, their own No. 17 and No. 48 overall picks, plus trade a player or two (perhaps Jim Kleinsasser and/or Nate Burleson), to New Orleans for the Saints' No. 2 overall pick.

http://www.twincities.com/mld/twinci...s/14100229.htm

e.j. henderson and bennet and the picks is my counter offer

i'll take that deal only if you throw them brooks, i mean throw in brooks.........smitty

03-14-2006, 07:28 AM	#1
ssmitty 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,879	question? does someone know number wise how the 22nd, 29th, and 61st, would add up to the 2nd pick?..................smitty
ssmitty 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,879

03-15-2006, 04:51 PM	#6
ssmitty 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,879	Originally Posted by LKelley67 from twincities.com smitty? However, some people think the Vikings might be able to take the No. 51 pick from Miami, their own No. 17 and No. 48 overall picks, plus trade a player or two (perhaps Jim Kleinsasser and/or Nate Burleson), to New Orleans for the Saints' No. 2 overall pick. http://www.twincities.com/mld/twinci...s/14100229.htm e.j. henderson and bennet and the picks is my counter offer i'll take that deal only if you throw them brooks, i mean throw in brooks.........smitty
ssmitty 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,879

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-14-2006, 08:03 AM	#2
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	RE: question? they do not add up to it. #2 is 2600pts, those add up to 1712pts. throw in #18 and it would be equal. someone proposing a denver trade? here's a link to a value chart to keep handy this time of year- http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/6330687 if getting brees, i like trading down to #4 the jets spot and get #35 and #71 in return (close value). that would then be #4, 34, 35, and 71- d'brick, a top 6 LB (or 2), another starter, and a replacement for our missing 3rd rounder. one more handy link- http://www.draftboardinsider.com/res...raftorder.html

03-15-2006, 07:29 AM	#3
ssmitty 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,879	thanks for the link kelly........ now, the vikings are looking for a qb.............. how about the 17th, 48th, 51st, and next yrs 1st? or 2nd and 3rd? smitty
ssmitty 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,879

03-15-2006, 08:46 AM	#4
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	LOL, do the math schmitskins... #2= 2600pts 17+48+51= 1760 that is 840pts shy. picks for the next season are generally scored as one round lower. an average first rounder would= less than 500pts. the roll of the dice with a next years pick is a surprising finish. last winter if trading for the bears first rounder you might have expected to get #10 to #16 on the high end, probably lower. oops, surprise to #26. the opposite with the jets. most would have thought maybe a mid first round pick at best. viola you get #4. trading out of the top costs a lot! the eli trade was about right. to move up 3 spots (essentially) the giants had to give the #3 that year plus the #1 and #5 the next. the high cost is what makes swapping with TN or NYJ most viable. the saints would probably be satisfied with a #2 and #3 this year or a #3 and next years #1. that is unless a bidding war ensues. i like the prospects of that! hermdingerdog, leinarts former OC is at TN and the Jets would have to love having a marquee golden boy to hand the reins to. to drop lower than the top 6-7 would require at least two first rounders and/or an established starter probably.

03-15-2006, 09:19 AM	#5
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	from twincities.com smitty? However, some people think the Vikings might be able to take the No. 51 pick from Miami, their own No. 17 and No. 48 overall picks, plus trade a player or two (perhaps Jim Kleinsasser and/or Nate Burleson), to New Orleans for the Saints' No. 2 overall pick. http://www.twincities.com/mld/twinci...s/14100229.htm e.j. henderson and bennet and the picks is my counter offer