Aaron Brooks will kill our Saints!

Tobias-Reiper · 03-18-2006, 02:27 PM

Originally Posted by wheelman

Who are you Drew's love puppet?

No, but I am a friend of the English language.

fatz6179 · 03-18-2006, 02:33 PM

*edited for content by pakowitz*

LivnaLieTimay · 03-18-2006, 02:43 PM

I'll be the first to say that I have been real tough and critical of Drew Brees and I never said anything bad about Brooks. He was the qb during our only playoff win and I wish him well wherever he goes. However, Brees is an upgrade from Brooks, it was time for Brooks and the Saints to go in different directions. The thing I like about the Brees signing is that if he doesn't peform after the first year we can let him go. I have concerns about his shoulder but if he is healthy it is an upgrade in qb. I personally like Leinart (as everyone knows already) over both these guys but if I had to take Brees or Brooks I'm taking Brees. Brees is a smart qb who I believe will be able to manage the offense more effectively than Brooks. While these 2 players may put up similar numbers in terms of yards and td's Brees makes far fewer mistakes.

GoldRush26 · 03-18-2006, 02:51 PM

Originally Posted by LivnaLieTimay

I'll be the first to say that I have been real tough and critical of Drew Brees and I never said anything bad about Brooks. He was the qb during our only playoff win and I wish him well wherever he goes. However, Brees is an upgrade from Brooks, it was time for Brooks and the Saints to go in different directions. The thing I like about the Brees signing is that if he doesn't peform after the first year we can let him go. I have concerns about his shoulder but if he is healthy it is an upgrade in qb. I personally like Leinart (as everyone knows already) over both these guys but if I had to take Brees or Brooks I'm taking Brees. Brees is a smart qb who I believe will be able to manage the offense more effectively than Brooks. While these 2 players may put up similar numbers in terms of yards and td's Brees makes far fewer mistakes.

And Brees completes a far greater percentage of his passes, which is equally as important. More completions means longer drives and less three and outs, which was the norm for us.

fatz6179 · 03-18-2006, 02:53 PM

I'll be the first to say that I have been real tough and critical of Drew Brees and I never said anything bad about Brooks. He was the qb during our only playoff win and I wish him well wherever he goes. However, Brees is an upgrade from Brooks, it was time for Brooks and the Saints to go in different directions. The thing I like about the Brees signing is that if he doesn't peform after the first year we can let him go. I have concerns about his shoulder but if he is healthy it is an upgrade in qb. I personally like Leinart (as everyone knows already) over both these guys but if I had to take Brees or Brooks I'm taking Brees. Brees is a smart qb who I believe will be able to manage the offense more effectively than Brooks. While these 2 players may put up similar numbers in terms of yards and td's Brees makes far fewer mistakes.

You are the only one that I can reason with...yes! Finally! Brees over Brooks not quite sure we gotta see cuz remember in 200 we ain't have nothing and Brooks made due. Brees always had a squad and a defense

fatz6179 · 03-18-2006, 02:54 PM

And Brees completes a far greater percentage of his passes, which is equally as important. More completions means longer drives and less three and outs, which was the norm for us.

Yeah that's true but completions mean the reciever catches the ball...Stallworth drops alot of them mang...so keep in mind pass and catch.

GoldRush26 · 03-18-2006, 03:15 PM

Originally Posted by fatz6179

And Brees completes a far greater percentage of his passes, which is equally as important. More completions means longer drives and less three and outs, which was the norm for us.

Yeah that's true but completions mean the reciever catches the ball...Stallworth drops alot of them mang...so keep in mind pass and catch.

Now you're at a point where you're making excuses for Brooks. And the team in 2000 was winning before Blake got hurt....Brooks just rode the wave that Blake started....not like he turned the team around or anything. The more and more players that we got, Brooks seemed to get worse. We have had Horn...a Pro Bowl WR...since 2000. We got Deuce...a Pro Bowl RB...in '01....Stallworth in '02....Henderson in '04. Other than the '03 season which seems like a fluke...he's been consistently average.

fatz6179 · 03-18-2006, 03:25 PM

nope. Blake did nothing. Horn a nobody until AB and him met. Stallworth injury prone his early career. he dropped alot of balls.......until this year.....Deuce what can I say I luv Deucey i wathced him play in Shreveport in the Indie game numerous times we needed him,

*edited for content by pakowitz*

fatz6179 · 03-18-2006, 03:26 PM

Oh with brooks I followed his whole career and even met him on a couple occasions when he played for Virginia, the man has game whether you see or not the reocrd books knw him very well so who cares wut ya'll say he's there immortalized so I'm moving on.

TheDeuce · 03-18-2006, 03:30 PM

Trying to make Brooks sound like the QB he was in 2000 is just ridiculous. He's actually gotten worse. This guy is just making excuses,
(P.s.- this sounds familiar)

*edited for content by pakowitz*

03-18-2006, 02:27 PM	#31
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: RE: Aaron Brooks will kill our Saints! Originally Posted by wheelman Who are you Drew's love puppet? No, but I am a friend of the English language.

03-18-2006, 02:33 PM	#32
fatz6179 Registered Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Streetport,LA Posts: 83	RE: Re: RE: Aaron Brooks will kill our Saints! edited for content by pakowitz

03-18-2006, 02:43 PM	#33
LivnaLieTimay 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: New York Posts: 1,498	RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Aaron Brooks will kill our Saint I'll be the first to say that I have been real tough and critical of Drew Brees and I never said anything bad about Brooks. He was the qb during our only playoff win and I wish him well wherever he goes. However, Brees is an upgrade from Brooks, it was time for Brooks and the Saints to go in different directions. The thing I like about the Brees signing is that if he doesn't peform after the first year we can let him go. I have concerns about his shoulder but if he is healthy it is an upgrade in qb. I personally like Leinart (as everyone knows already) over both these guys but if I had to take Brees or Brooks I'm taking Brees. Brees is a smart qb who I believe will be able to manage the offense more effectively than Brooks. While these 2 players may put up similar numbers in terms of yards and td's Brees makes far fewer mistakes.

03-18-2006, 02:51 PM	#34
GoldRush26 500th Post Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 594	Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Aaron Brooks will kill our S Originally Posted by LivnaLieTimay I'll be the first to say that I have been real tough and critical of Drew Brees and I never said anything bad about Brooks. He was the qb during our only playoff win and I wish him well wherever he goes. However, Brees is an upgrade from Brooks, it was time for Brooks and the Saints to go in different directions. The thing I like about the Brees signing is that if he doesn't peform after the first year we can let him go. I have concerns about his shoulder but if he is healthy it is an upgrade in qb. I personally like Leinart (as everyone knows already) over both these guys but if I had to take Brees or Brooks I'm taking Brees. Brees is a smart qb who I believe will be able to manage the offense more effectively than Brooks. While these 2 players may put up similar numbers in terms of yards and td's Brees makes far fewer mistakes. And Brees completes a far greater percentage of his passes, which is equally as important. More completions means longer drives and less three and outs, which was the norm for us.
GoldRush26 500th Post Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 594

03-18-2006, 02:53 PM	#35
fatz6179 Registered Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Streetport,LA Posts: 83	RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Aaron Brooks will kill our Saint I'll be the first to say that I have been real tough and critical of Drew Brees and I never said anything bad about Brooks. He was the qb during our only playoff win and I wish him well wherever he goes. However, Brees is an upgrade from Brooks, it was time for Brooks and the Saints to go in different directions. The thing I like about the Brees signing is that if he doesn't peform after the first year we can let him go. I have concerns about his shoulder but if he is healthy it is an upgrade in qb. I personally like Leinart (as everyone knows already) over both these guys but if I had to take Brees or Brooks I'm taking Brees. Brees is a smart qb who I believe will be able to manage the offense more effectively than Brooks. While these 2 players may put up similar numbers in terms of yards and td's Brees makes far fewer mistakes. You are the only one that I can reason with...yes! Finally! Brees over Brooks not quite sure we gotta see cuz remember in 200 we ain't have nothing and Brooks made due. Brees always had a squad and a defense

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-18-2006, 02:54 PM	#36
fatz6179 Registered Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Streetport,LA Posts: 83	RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Aaron Brooks will kill our Saint And Brees completes a far greater percentage of his passes, which is equally as important. More completions means longer drives and less three and outs, which was the norm for us. Yeah that's true but completions mean the reciever catches the ball...Stallworth drops alot of them mang...so keep in mind pass and catch.

03-18-2006, 03:15 PM	#37
GoldRush26 500th Post Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 594	Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Aaron Brooks will kill our S Originally Posted by fatz6179 And Brees completes a far greater percentage of his passes, which is equally as important. More completions means longer drives and less three and outs, which was the norm for us. Yeah that's true but completions mean the reciever catches the ball...Stallworth drops alot of them mang...so keep in mind pass and catch. Now you're at a point where you're making excuses for Brooks. And the team in 2000 was winning before Blake got hurt....Brooks just rode the wave that Blake started....not like he turned the team around or anything. The more and more players that we got, Brooks seemed to get worse. We have had Horn...a Pro Bowl WR...since 2000. We got Deuce...a Pro Bowl RB...in '01....Stallworth in '02....Henderson in '04. Other than the '03 season which seems like a fluke...he's been consistently average.
GoldRush26 500th Post Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 594

03-18-2006, 03:25 PM	#38
fatz6179 Registered Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Streetport,LA Posts: 83	RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Aaron Brooks will kill o nope. Blake did nothing. Horn a nobody until AB and him met. Stallworth injury prone his early career. he dropped alot of balls.......until this year.....Deuce what can I say I luv Deucey i wathced him play in Shreveport in the Indie game numerous times we needed him, edited for content by pakowitz

03-18-2006, 03:26 PM	#39
fatz6179 Registered Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Streetport,LA Posts: 83	RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Aaron Brooks will kill o Oh with brooks I followed his whole career and even met him on a couple occasions when he played for Virginia, the man has game whether you see or not the reocrd books knw him very well so who cares wut ya'll say he's there immortalized so I'm moving on.

03-18-2006, 03:30 PM	#40
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928	RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Aaron Brooks will kill o Trying to make Brooks sound like the QB he was in 2000 is just ridiculous. He's actually gotten worse. This guy is just making excuses, (P.s.- this sounds familiar) edited for content by pakowitz
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928