|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; take the time to check it out. i agree whole heartedly. this will have me devising multiple trade down scenarios LOL. http://www.footballoutsiders.com/ram...?p=2530&cat=10...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-18-2006, 06:13 PM | #1 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
|
Excellent Read About Draft Pick Values and Trading
take the time to check it out. i agree whole heartedly. this will have me devising multiple trade down scenarios LOL.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/ram...?p=2530&cat=10 |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
03-18-2006, 06:27 PM | #2 |
Sammich Lover
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 682
|
RE: Excellent Read About Draft Pick Values and Trading
the moment you begin to rely on mathematical formulas to determine how you run your franchise is the moment your franchise goes down the toilet. The key to any good trade is your instinct, and not a number value.
|
03-18-2006, 06:44 PM | #3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
|
I do not believe in such formulas either but there is empirical evidence to show the success ratio of 2nd round picks in relation to salary paid. NFL teams do use that value chart pretty tightly. look at any trade of picks and you can see that. With those values ask yourself this question- would you rather the Saints #2 overal pick or if you could devise such a trade, would you rather have picks #36, 37, 38, 39, and 40 instead? (by the charts they are equal). The 5 selections for me easily. I think the main thrust of the article was the wisdom of trading down not how it was figured.
|
03-19-2006, 07:21 AM | #4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,879
|
good read kelly.............
a lot of truth be said to tying up a lot of money on one player...... it's amazing the minute that salary cap went up how many more bucks teams spent...... and, on one player at that... to take a chance on all that money is a gamble to say the least.. let's see how many 2nd round picks you can get us on your mock trade......smitty |
03-19-2006, 01:43 PM | #5 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
|
LOL, you suckered me in, alright...
#2 for NYJ #4, #35, and 2007 3rd rounder (going light just to show how possible it can be) then #4 and one of the then two 2007 3rd rounders to Oakland for #7 and #38 add in 2007 #1 for Denver's #22 (widely reported how they want less draft picks this year) the result= #7, 22, 34, 35, 38 with no #1 in 2007 Five picks, all being potential starters. Say- A.J. Hawk LB, Eric Winston OT, Ashton Youboty CB, Claude Wroten DT, and maybe even Nick Mangold C. Not too far out to be possible. Your call- those 5 and no #1 in 2007 or D'brick and Wroten (as things are now) with the 2007 #1. PS/ I really like the idea of trading 2007 picks cuz I think there is the potential to be one of the most improved/turnaround teams next season (ala Bears or Bucs last year). |
03-19-2006, 03:15 PM | #6 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,879
|
come on kelly, we need one more 2nd rounder.............is that the best you can do? smitty
|
03-19-2006, 04:28 PM | #7 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
|
hehehe, okay how bout even better. with a forecast of the jets/seahawk trade working here ya go...
swap #2 to #4 for #31 and #71 swap #4 and # 98 (4th) to #7 for #38 swap #130 (5th) and acquired #38 for #29 swap #162 (6th), #194 (7th), and 2007 first round for #22 end result? #7, 22, 29, 31, 34, and 71 that's your whole draft, 5 of the top 34 players and one more. one high impact starter and 4 other good shots at being starters. |
03-19-2006, 05:49 PM | #8 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,879
|
Originally Posted by LKelley67
but kelly, how would we fare getting out the first all together, come on, a mind is a terrible thing to waste, don't you agree?...................smitty after all, we're not only looking for value, we're looking for a dominating team for yrs to come..........while, saving money.........is'nt this how super bowl teams become, super bowl teams?
|
03-19-2006, 06:14 PM | #9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,879
|
and don't forget about teams like buffalo, lions, gb, even san fran, and especially the cowboys.......smitty
|