![]() |
Quote:
Here's a quote from West coach Dennis Franchione after the East-West Shrine Game....... Quote:
|
That quote is against college guys, but point taken. Still, I don't really wanna go into the season counting too heavily on some undrafted guy. I can't get too excited about that no matter how much good stuff I read. I can get excited about Stallworth catching balls from Brees though. I do dig what you are saying, and I have said the same thing, if we get a starter caliber player at a need position for Stallworth, we may have to go for it. I am a big Devery fan as well and I hope he can step in and be the deep threat we need. But basing trading Donte on Colston's "potential," ugh. I like Haas though. And I am not trying to knock Colston. Hopefully we just keep Donte and don't have to worry about it, but if we trade him, the player we get in return must be starter quality. And hopefully will be on defense. And won't be a DE or safety.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I WAS HOPING STALLWORTH FOR DIET PEPSI MACHINE!! (just a thought)
:nutkick: JOHNNY CAGE WINS!! |
I really don't understand this love affair with Stallworth. Geez he's not irreplaceable talent. I don't want him to go but if he does I won't lose any sleep over it. Could he have a breakout season next season? Absolutely, but I could name about 5 other recievers on the cusp of "breaking out" themselves that could easily come in and replace Stallworth and the team would do no worse. He's not a special talent, not a #1 talent IMO. I've never seen him make any spectacular catches, and he doesn't go up the middle at all. Again....so you guys don't misunderstand me, I'm not in favor of trading him at all costs, but he's absolutely replaceable. As far as #2 recievers go, he's probably near the middle of the pack, maybe a little better. I counted 12 #2 recievers that I would take over him and at least 2 #3s.
I can't think of many recievers in recent memory that were mediocre with one QB and were outstanding with another. I think what we've seen from Stallworth thus far is more or less what we're gonna get. |
Quote:
a good reciever is suppose to catch the ball, if it is catchable, and in a lot of cases, catch it if it's not catchable.........why did we draft donte in the first place? because he was a burner with the threat to score from anywhere on the field. however, donte is not a possession reciever......... and lord knows, we need some........horn, who is a possession reciever and probably the best reciever the saints have ever had, has lost a step, but would i trade him? no........but the times they are a changing.........we will have new faces everywhere and this includes the recievers position...............smitty |
2 Points
1) I do not consider Brooks a legit NFL QB, so my verdict on Stallworth is still out. 2) I wouldn't mind D.P. MACHINE on our team, either. |
Excellent points ghandi. Well, at least the first one. :wink:
2 more points: 1) Horn got 90% of ABs passes thrown his way 2) Horn led the team in drops the last couple of seasons, and just being hurt last year prob prevented him from doing it again. Now, being the recipient of so many balls his way, is Horn just butter fingers or could a garbage QB have had anything to do with his drops? Take your pick. Anyone who says Donte hasn't done anything special is not watching Saints games or something. River City Relay? It was Donte making THREE defendes miss to get that started. Guess who has the Saints rookie record for receiving TDs? Donte, in a season cut short by injury. Stop hatin. |
Donte has as much talent as any WR in the league. I will admit that. But can you honestly blame AB for him not progressing the way he should? I am not going to say that isnt a factor, but the point i am trying to make is in his entire career, he has never had back to back games where he has had at least 70 yards receiving. What's that? That cant be ALL AB's fault. I want the Saints to keep him, but i wont lose any sleep if they trade him. Thats why i say if he breaks out this year, its for the money...thats my opinion.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://snap.stats.com/stats/nflinfo/index.asp
Although you can go to this site, and look individually at Stallworth, and Joe if you type their names in. Joe had more drops than Donte in 2003 and 2004, and they don't have a drops record for 2002. Pathon did tie Joe in 2003 for the team lead in drops with 5 though. |
Quote:
Are we ready to say that Stallworth is as good as Reggie Wayne(or Brandon Stokley for that matter) Marty Booker T.J. Hoshamanzadeh Eric Moulds Rod Smith Jerry Porter Terry Glenn Amani Toomer Keyshawn Johnson Joey Galloway Larry Fitzgerald Issac Bruce Nate Burleson Anyone that can give me evidence that Stallworth is as good as or better than any of the above listed #2 recievers please stand up. If not, then that puts him a little bit above the middle of the pack. And a good portion of these recievers have been traded at least ONCE in their careers. And he wants to be a #1 reciever?????? He is what his is....an average to slightly above average #2 reciever. |
Quote:
As far as your list, LMAO!!! Donte is easily better than Glenn, Porter, Moulds, Toomer, Galloway, Booker, Burleson. And Brandon Stokley firmly makes you a hater if you honestly believe he is better than Stallworth. Keyshawn was a number one his whole career. Wayne plays with Peyton freaking Manning and has Harrison on the other side. TJ has Chad Johnson on the other side and has Carson Palmer. Fitzgerald is clearly a number one receiver. Isaac Bruce was a number one his whole career, but Donte killed him stat wise last year. And Rod Smith is clearly a number one receiver. So what point did you prove by making a list with number one receivers, guys who play with QBs CLEARLY far superior to anything Donte has ever had, and guys who Donte is better than? Prob best not to get football info from Madden 2006. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
8) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hope you found that useful. Good day. 8) |
Quote:
Look at the results buddy. All of them have amassed better stats than Stallworth. But a silly thing like RESULTS probably don't matter to you either. You MUST be saying that all of their success is attributed to their QB then. So lets see some of the QBs these guys have had throwing to them. Sage Rosenfels AJ Feely Kerry Collins Brian Griese Chad Hutchinson J.P. Losman Kelly Holcomb Rob Johnson Rex Grossman BILLY JOE HOBERT HAHAHA Sorry but I'd take AB over these hacks any day. Moulds has had NO ONE since Jim Kelly at the beginning of his career, still put up great numbers, yet Stallworth is clearly better than him?? What a joke. But yeah....AB has been holding him down all of this time. Some of these guys have had pure HACKS throwing them passes, yet they still managed to put up decent stats. Stokley was thrown in there for humor, but I guess you didnt think it was too funny. Wayne may have Peyton but he could come to THIS team and be a #1 reciever. Stallworth doesn't come close to comparing to Wayne. As for the others we can sub in Boldin for Fitzgerald then, Torry Holt for Issac Bruce, Javon Walker for Rod Smith and we still have players that are superior to Stallworth. You've made no points that would suggest Stallworth is "clearly better" than these players, just attempted to ridicule what i've pointed out to mask your complete lack of any evidence to support your claims whatsoever. Not your best work. |
Quote:
|
cut that crap out or ill end it myself
|
Quote:
And wayne on this team with AB, would be Stallworth. And Stallworth in Indy with Peyton and those coaches, would be Wayne. See how easy that is, easy as saying Wayne would come here and be a number one. Had he played his whole career HERE though, he would be Donte and vice versa. Sub Boldin for Fitzgerald? Boldin is a number one receiver. Went to the pro bowl as a rookie. Oops. Holt it is a number one receiver. I thought your point was to compare Donte to number two receivers. Did you change that? Don't confuse yourself. Javon Walker is also a number one receiver. So are you comparing Donte to twos or ones, since your first point was he was an average two. You have no proff of that, so you wanna say he is an average two compared to ones? LMAO!!! Ok. Slick, but not effective. Try again? |
Quote:
Apparently I'm talking about all time with respect to my QB listing, which enforces my point even more. Who cares about one season??? HOWEVER if you wanna play the one season card now, Stallworth was ranked 24th out of all NFL recievers in yardage and 26th in receiving TDs, and that was last year getting the lion's share of the throws his way. What about those numbers is special. Why is he better than any of the WRs I listed??? It's sweet that you believe in him, but he has to put up numbers in the NFL, not excuses like you're making for him. Other WRs have had a much more tumultous QB situation than Stallworth, yet put up stats better than his. QB starters on other teams, such as Miami, Chicago, and Buffalo have been interchangable pretty much since the turn of the century. I listed those QBs because they are pertinent to the arguement I'm making. A team has a number 1 reciever, and a number 2 reciever. That how it is. You can't say that a team has two #1s just because you feel like it. Out of Fitzgerald and Boldin, one of them is a #2. Out of Javon Walker and Rod Smith, one of them is a #2. Been this way ever since there was such a thing as a depth chart. Seems like you're the only one confused here. All teams have a #1 and a #2. Just because Stallworth can't compare to any of those i mentioned(oh except for Issac Bruce and Eric Moulds, who Stallworth is clearly better than....lol that is laughable)you're totally ignoring the concept of a depth chart. Mmmmm ok. |
I think that the system that Stallworth has played in and the limitations implicit because of the personnel has played a significant role in his development. Having a "one read" offense that played against 8 in the box defenses would stunt anyone's development. Plus, Deuce's injury made the run offense less effective and put more pressure on that one read system. It didn't appear that the system had "hot reads" or a construct of check-offs to exploit defenses. A #2 receiver is going to be the beneficiary of most of those offensive features. The fact that Stallworth made any progress at all in 2005 says more about his talent and determination. Payton's new offensive scheme, with a smart and effective quarterback and a fearsome running attack will make Stallworth's defensive secondary stretching abilities more attractive and effective as a #2. Can anyone name another starting #2 who's got 4.29 speed and can catch the ball better than his #1 counterpart?
|
Quote:
Look I'm not saying Stallworth is not a legitimate NFL talent. He's average to above average. However, are we forgetting that he IS on the trading block?????? This is fact. Apparently I'm not the only one who thinks he's not a good fit for the team. And I don't get the love affair with him. His world class speed is his greatest asset, and that's enough to keep him employed. He doesn't make spectacular catches. He doesn't outjump people. He doesn't go across the middle. Nothing remarkable. His speed is not replaceable, but if anyone thinks that Amani Toomer or Joey Galloway couldn't come in and do what he's doing....come on. |
Quote:
I do think there are teams that would make Stallworth #2 and there are teams that would make him #3. Everyone made good points about other players' situations and results, but Stallworth is a good player and he helps us win. Hopefully he will get the same fire in his belly that Steve Smith has because he has the talent for it. Jerry Stackhouse never became the 2nd Jordan so it may not happen. We should have kept Hakim too, but we can't have verything. |
Where do I even begin?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What kinda argument is this? ZERO proof. Let me try" Other wide receivers have put up far worse stats than Stallworth with much better QBs than he has ever played with. Man, that was easy. IS that all there is to making up whatever I want? Nice. :roll: Quote:
|
Hey Goldrush, my bad bro. Believe what you want. I don't want this to go on forever. We have different opinions of Stallworth. It's all good.
|
I have been gone for 4 days and i see this discussion sort of got out of hand. Some valid points, some questionable points...but the one that i pointed out that cannot be disputed...is that he has been in the league for 4 YEARS and has NEVER had back to back games with 70 yards receiving...thats not even a hard number to reach. I would love to hear someone make sense of that. My only negative on Donte is that he isnt consistent enough to be counted on.
|
|
if donte gets traded...so be it
until then he is still a saint and he can only get better with brees in and AB out go saints |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We'll all find out when the season is over with. My prediction is he catches 75 balls and racks up 1100 yards. I can definately see him making that Javon Walker type leap this year... a breakout year which will make the release of Horn down the road for cap purposes much easier.
|
OK, you mean to tell me that it is ok for someone to be in the league for that long and still never have back to back productive games because of his QB. Horn did it game in and game out for years. And as much as i couldnt stand him, not counting last year, AB's numbers were respectable. He hit some high numbers in yards and TD's so he wasnt all bad all the time. You cannot blame all of it on him. Stallworth is more than partly responsible for his lack of production.
|
Quote:
|
no way stallworth catches 75 this coming year. there's just too many people to spread the ball around to.
would be a good over/under poll, though. i'd take under. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com