|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Come to think of it, they probably acquired this guy because of his run stuffing ability. If he makes the run defense better, then the safeties can sit deeper in coverage and prevent big plays in the passing game. You ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-23-2006, 06:34 PM | #21 |
Sammich Lover
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 682
|
Come to think of it, they probably acquired this guy because of his run stuffing ability. If he makes the run defense better, then the safeties can sit deeper in coverage and prevent big plays in the passing game. You know, cover for the cornerback's lazy a$$.
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
08-23-2006, 06:49 PM | #22 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,744
|
I thought about that after I posted wheelman and it makes sense... but the impact Edwards could have made compared to this guy probably would have been greater. Edwards probably still has about 2 or 3 more years in him. I'll stay optimistic for now on this guy but I see more of a special teams contributor out of him.
Anyone know how many more years this guy has left on his contract? |
08-23-2006, 06:55 PM | #23 |
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014 |
So we traded Michael Bennet, a 1st round draft pick, top 3 running back (2002) and a prized offseason acquisition for a 4th rounder, eating his signing bonus, then took that 4th rounder and traded it for a backup LB, a former 7th round draft choice who's starts came through injuries to the two players above him on the depth chart.
And we had the opportunity to trade for several quality 1st string LBs earlier. Is it my imagination, or are we still in reverse? |
08-23-2006, 07:04 PM | #24 |
Sammich Lover
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 682
|
Just because Bennett was a top three running back four years ago, that doesn't mean you were going to get much for him in 2006. As much as I liked signing him, it was a gamble. The man has serious injury problems, and the team was hoping that he would stay healthy.
|
08-23-2006, 07:04 PM | #25 |
100th Post
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ol' Metry
Posts: 239
|
While I have since shied away from the idea of trading for Edwards, there has to be someone of more value we could've gotten for the no. 4 pick. I'm sure Payton is familiar with this guy and that's why we made the trade, but COME ON!!! |
08-23-2006, 07:08 PM | #26 |
Sammich Lover
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 682
|
I love how you people are simply passing him off as a scrub, only because you don't know who he is.
|
08-23-2006, 07:16 PM | #27 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
I'm not pleased. We just gave up a 4th round pick for a backup LB. Sweet. I mean I know that Payton has been big on getting guys from Dallas to follow him here, but this is kinda ridiculous. I saw the article this morning when it broke and it was an undisclosed draft pick at the time, so I figured it would be a 7th or 6th at worst. But no, we give up a 4th round pick for a veteran who nobody's ever heard of. I live in Dallas and I can only vaguely remember ever hearing his name. Well I'm glad we got some serious help for the LB corps. Sweet. Why didn't we try to pool some picks together and actually make an effort at a guy who actually has some talent/real starting experience. Ugh is right whodi
|
08-23-2006, 07:19 PM | #28 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
|
08-23-2006, 07:26 PM | #29 |
Sammich Lover
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 682
|
Name all four starting linebackers for the San Diego Chargers. And no Internet, just off the top of your head.
|
08-23-2006, 07:27 PM | #30 |
100th Post
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ol' Metry
Posts: 239
|
Agreed Deuce.
|