|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; How many of you agree that we should have kept Jamaal Branch over Aaron Stecker. It must be the Aaron Curse....
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-03-2006, 01:15 PM | #11 |
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1
|
How many of you agree that we should have kept Jamaal Branch over Aaron Stecker. It must be the Aaron Curse.
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
09-03-2006, 01:46 PM | #12 |
Part Time Pimp
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,967
|
I think the plan was to keep both. Jamaal Branch is going to the practice squad. This may have been a smart move after all.
|
09-03-2006, 01:54 PM | #13 |
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 42
|
|
09-03-2006, 02:01 PM | #14 |
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 42
|
|
09-03-2006, 02:20 PM | #15 |
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 42
|
I think freddie roach got cut as well...if so, he'd be a good backup linebacker.
|
09-03-2006, 02:28 PM | #16 |
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 42
|
some other guys worth considering:
Stephon leflors qb-better than bouman. http://www.nfl.com/transactions Duane Starks CB http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/12727 |
09-03-2006, 02:33 PM | #17 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Williamsburg, VA (ugh, the food here)
Posts: 1,704
|
Originally Posted by achillesjaden
I'm very disappointed about Branch. See, just because Branch gets signed to our practice squad doesn't mean he can't be signed by another team. I'm not sure as to the exact procedure and rules, but I've heard this before. So, in reality he'll be as available to anyone else as he is to the Saints. That's why I'd have kept him over Stecker, who I've always liked, but for the money difference and the way Branch had played, Branch would have been my guy.
|
09-03-2006, 02:55 PM | #18 |
LB Mentallity
|
I go with danny clark oakland also. that is a cut that made no sense. just look at the #s from the last 2 yrs.
Year Team ................G Total Tckl Ast Sacks Int Yds Avg Lg TD Pass Def 2004 Oakland Raiders 16 129 ..98.0 31 ...2 ......0 ...0 ...0.0 ..0 ...0 ....5 2005 Oakland Raiders 16 113 ..82.0 31 ...1 ......0 ...0 ...0.0 ..0 ...0 ....7 Okay you DE freaks here is guy to put in your 100+ tackles a year and he is 29. now go for the 4 year deal and dump him at 33. |
"We may have lost the game, but you'll be hurting tomorrow." Doug Atkins
|
|
09-03-2006, 03:01 PM | #19 |
Part Time Pimp
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,967
|
Duane Starks would be an upgrade at the #2 CB position for us.
|
09-03-2006, 05:37 PM | #20 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 578
|
Starks is like 50 yrs old, go with the younger just as good player in Warfield, add Clark and a few corners
|