checking on our trade of stallworth

chRxis · 11-06-2006, 07:39 PM

was it good?! of course it was?! we traded an injury prone #2 receiver and got a solid starting linebacker, which was a weakness for us last year, and an extra pick in the 3rd or 4th round next year.... plus, it allows us to put some of our younger, talented wideouts out on the field, that may not have had that chance if we still would have stallworth.... if we would have kept him, colston might not be getting the playing time he is now, plus stallworth would have walked after the season without us getting anything in return.... considering how much he's playing for the eagles, we came out smelling like a rose with this one...

11-06-2006, 07:39 PM	#10
chRxis 500th Post Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Baton Rouge, LA Posts: 690	was it good?! of course it was?! we traded an injury prone #2 receiver and got a solid starting linebacker, which was a weakness for us last year, and an extra pick in the 3rd or 4th round next year.... plus, it allows us to put some of our younger, talented wideouts out on the field, that may not have had that chance if we still would have stallworth.... if we would have kept him, colston might not be getting the playing time he is now, plus stallworth would have walked after the season without us getting anything in return.... considering how much he's playing for the eagles, we came out smelling like a rose with this one...