|
|||||||
Auto Reject.
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Since signing up as a member on bland and gold I have enjoyed most of the member's perspective on the Saints but some members on here are lacking Saints knowlege and even football knowlege. I was just wondering if it ...
 |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-29-2003, 10:29 AM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,209
|
Auto Reject.
Since signing up as a member on bland and gold I have enjoyed most of the member's perspective on the Saints but some members on here are lacking Saints knowlege and even football knowlege. I was just wondering if it is possible to put some kind of auto reject for posts from members who are talking out the side of their necks. lol.......hope this one doesn't get auto rejected............
|
|
|
05-29-2003, 10:50 AM
|
#2 |
|
Kinder, gentler
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
|
Auto Reject.
You mean censorship?
|
|
|
|
05-29-2003, 11:09 AM
|
#3 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 1,838
|
Auto Reject.
Billy, I think I\'m auto-rejecting this one....
|
|
|
|
05-29-2003, 11:11 AM
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,209
|
Auto Reject.
No not censorship. They would just go to another board where their equal peers could read them.
|
|
|
|
05-29-2003, 11:21 AM
|
#5 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 1,838
|
Auto Reject.
Setting up an auto-reject feature would be nearly impossible to implement. Unless we bar particular usernames. But if we do, those same users could simply re-register under another username. The cycle would be perpetual.
I don\'t mind it when asinine comments end up on the board. I really don\'t. They amuse me, in fact. And since it\'s pretty much impossible to prevent, the best option may be to simply ignore or be amused... 
|
|
|
|
05-29-2003, 02:19 PM
|
#6 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: CRYSTAL BEACH TEXAS
Posts: 4,100
|
Auto Reject.
BillyC, in answer to your question. Sure we could delete some of the statements made by members. The question should be why would we do it. It\'s their right to ask or make the statement just as it\'s your right not to agree with it. If we had to delete everything said by everyone we disagree with, there wouldn\'t be any reason for this or any other board. Thanks for your statement even though I disagree with it. LOL
|
|
|
|
05-29-2003, 03:00 PM
|
#7 |
|
Resident antediluvian
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,026
|
Auto Reject.
Not that I agree with the idea either, but I\'m sure it could be put in where you could opt to ignore certain posters. I know in some chatrooms you have the ability to not recieve messages from people you turn off. Kinda like ICQ when you hide from a contact.
|
|
|
|
05-29-2003, 05:06 PM
|
#8 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 1,838
|
Auto Reject.
Doable, but someone would have to rewrite the code interfacing with the http engine.
|
|
|
|
05-29-2003, 05:11 PM
|
#9 |
|
100th Post
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 157
|
Auto Reject.
ARGH!! Now I have a brainfart from trying to think too hard!
|
|
|
|
05-29-2003, 05:13 PM
|
#10 |
|
100th Post
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 213
|
Auto Reject.
Let\'s vote\'em off like Gilligan\'s Survivor Island!! Or have a flaming encouraged board!!
[Edited on 29/5/2003 by billyh1026] |
|
|
Linear Mode
