memory lane, the year 2001, just eliminated from playoffs.........

ssmitty · 05-09-2007, 02:07 PM

pay note to our offensive line, our defensive line and answer the question, did haslett not have what it took? ahhh, it's good to be back.............

http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/8772/

SapperSaint · 05-09-2007, 02:29 PM

"At quarterback, the only question is whether Blake or Brooks will win the battle to start. The two of them comprise the best quarterback tandem the Saints have ever had"

I wonder how different it would have been if Blake had been our number one during the AB years.

Fleured · 05-09-2007, 03:06 PM

Originally Posted by SapperSaint

"At quarterback, the only question is whether Blake or Brooks will win the battle to start. The two of them comprise the best quarterback tandem the Saints have ever had"

I wonder how different it would have been if Blake had been our number one during the AB years.

After all the trouble the team had went through to get Blake, one would think he could have been given a better chance to redeem his composure after his injury.

saintsrule · 05-09-2007, 03:47 PM

Brooks won the first playoff game the Saints ever won, and I liked him as the Saints QB. I just wish he had a better offensive line, the last couple of years. It was not Brooks' fault that Blake got hurt.

LongTimeFan · 05-09-2007, 07:43 PM

Some say that "you can't lose you're job due to an injury"

I never believed that saying, IMO Blake was the better QB of the two, I wish he would have been given another chance when he healed from his injuries to see how well he could have been in N.O
What ever happened to Blake anyway?

blacksaint · 05-09-2007, 11:54 PM

IMO, Blake should have never been cut, who ever made that call really F-UP! Maybe Brooks would have been a better QB had he sat behind Blake for a couple of years.

hagan714 · 05-10-2007, 06:42 AM

I do not care which QB played during the Haz years, they were going to loss. Haz and the Org. tore the club apart piece by piece. Look at the rosters thru Hazs years and you will see the drop off in wins as the players were lost. No body on the team stood a chance of winning.

Turley was right when he said his anger was over all the good players the team was letting get away and he did not want to be part off an Org. that is not committed to winning.

05-09-2007, 02:07 PM	#1
ssmitty 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,879	memory lane, the year 2001, just eliminated from playoffs......... pay note to our offensive line, our defensive line and answer the question, did haslett not have what it took? ahhh, it's good to be back............. http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/8772/
ssmitty 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,879

05-09-2007, 03:06 PM	#3
Fleured The NY Geaux Getter Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 348	Originally Posted by SapperSaint "At quarterback, the only question is whether Blake or Brooks will win the battle to start. The two of them comprise the best quarterback tandem the Saints have ever had" I wonder how different it would have been if Blake had been our number one during the AB years. After all the trouble the team had went through to get Blake, one would think he could have been given a better chance to redeem his composure after his injury.

05-09-2007, 03:47 PM	#4
saintsrule 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 657	Brooks won the first playoff game the Saints ever won, and I liked him as the Saints QB. I just wish he had a better offensive line, the last couple of years. It was not Brooks' fault that Blake got hurt.
saintsrule 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 657

05-10-2007, 06:42 AM	#7
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	I do not care which QB played during the Haz years, they were going to loss. Haz and the Org. tore the club apart piece by piece. Look at the rosters thru Hazs years and you will see the drop off in wins as the players were lost. No body on the team stood a chance of winning. Turley was right when he said his anger was over all the good players the team was letting get away and he did not want to be part off an Org. that is not committed to winning.
	Last edited by hagan714; 05-10-2007 at 06:45 AM..

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

05-09-2007, 02:29 PM	#2
SapperSaint Pink Nightmare Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Mississippi Posts: 3,028 Blog Entries: 7	"At quarterback, the only question is whether Blake or Brooks will win the battle to start. The two of them comprise the best quarterback tandem the Saints have ever had" I wonder how different it would have been if Blake had been our number one during the AB years.

05-09-2007, 07:43 PM	#5
LongTimeFan Moderator Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Louisiana Posts: 2,403	Some say that "you can't lose you're job due to an injury" I never believed that saying, IMO Blake was the better QB of the two, I wish he would have been given another chance when he healed from his injuries to see how well he could have been in N.O What ever happened to Blake anyway?

05-09-2007, 11:54 PM	#6
blacksaint DARE TO ENTER Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Home Sweet Home, NEW ORLEANS, La. Posts: 1,154	IMO, Blake should have never been cut, who ever made that call really F-UP! Maybe Brooks would have been a better QB had he sat behind Blake for a couple of years.