D24pick |
06-09-2007 01:39 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by saintsmissile
(Post 131399)
Porter is bigger, faster and has played against better competition. The kid ran a 4.29 forty. Young's best was 4.39. Football speed or not, it's not even close. I'm not saying that Young is a bad player, I am saying, however, that POTENTIALLY, Porter has more upside.
|
dude, there's no comparison what so ever. sure porter has played against tougher competetion, but that doesn't stand for much of anything. young came in, as a freshman, started ever since, and has been stout all the way through. young has played some very tough competetion and has still been shut-down against them. more of a better cb than your potential hyped porter was against good competetion. face it, potential takes you no where, until you prove yourself and a productive good player in the nfl, the best players play and thats that. the guy is making plays on deep balls in camp, sort of like the old-devery henderson, but on defense. making defenses in the long, but when it comes to actually being a cb and stopping all routes, hes getting torched out there.
anyone can run a flat-out burner type speed going in a strait line. wr's dont always go in a strait line bro. he has held up well to slant, cut routes ar all! and the reports from camp say so. i'd give him the potential case, but as ina player, potential cant focus over pure productivity and skill
|